关于法理学的论文题目有哪些英语

关于法理学的论文题目有哪些英语

在学校的话可以用学校的IP上知网找论文，很多的。

法理学是以整个法律现象的共同发展规律和共同性问题为研究对象的学科法理学被界定为法律的智慧，或者对"法律事业"的性质和语境的理解，而法理可以补充法律的不足，所以有些国家把法理作为最后适用的法源下面学术堂特意整理了一些好写的法理学论文题目，供大家参考:　　1997-2007:一国两制法治实践的法理学观察　　规范性司法解释的法源地位研究　　反思与重构:研究生法理学教学模式之改革　　试论中国法哲学自觉的必要性　　对法律要素理论的再认识　　法律救济权的法理学探析　　法理学视角下我国公立大学章程制定研究　　新疆少数民族地区法学教育人才培养目标的特殊性及其法理学思考　　执行和解的法理学分析　　司法实践的道路　　我国民族优惠政策的法理学探析　　公路规划制度的经济法学研究　　伦理与技术之间-法理学视角下的代孕问题

关于英语语法的论文题目有哪些

题目不要太大，也不要太小，太大了面太广容易泛泛，小了就无材料可查，没东西可写。写你熟悉的 资料好查的 参考

网上找啊，起码能参考一下

顶楼上 就是笨蛋是怎样炼成的笨蛋是怎样炼成的都通过了，我顶一下咋都不通过！不通过我换一个答案：白痴是怎样炼成的。你再不通过我还换！！

提供一些英语专业的毕业论文题目，供参考。

关于教学法的英语论文题目有哪些

语言测试在英语学习中的重要性 比较中西课堂教学及其对学生能力培养的影响 游戏在儿童英语教学中的运用 小学英语情趣教学漫谈 论中学英语教学中跨文化意识的培养 课堂气氛对高中英语教学效果的影响 记忆在语篇理解过程中的作用 记忆在词汇习得中的作用 谈英语阅读的制约因素及对策 跨文化交际中的体态语和中学英语教学 分析具有中国特色的双语教学 非智力因素在大学生英语学习中的影响 英语教学中的情感因素 论外语自主学习中师生的角色 让我们的思绪飞扬---浅谈在英语课堂教学中影响学生发言主动性的因素 C2C贸易中的写作技巧 大学生英语写作问题研究 文化词及其在外语教学中的功能 英语学习策略的成功案例 文化差异对阅读理解的影响 浅谈多媒体辅助英语教学及教师角色的改变 论母语文化在英语教学中的地位 英语教学中的文化导入

创新的题目肯定很多关键是你自己会不会些

随着信息技术的突飞猛进，网络信息技术与大学英语课程的整合从根本上改变了大学英语教学的本质，大学英语课堂教学也从传统课堂走向了现代网络环境下大学英语课堂。2007年8月，教育部颁发的《大学英语课程教学要求》明确提出了“基于计算机和课堂的大学英语教学模式”。在大学英语教学改革历程中，作为一种全新的教学形式，网络环境下大学英语教学为课堂教学带来优势的同时，也带来了教学理念、教学方法、教学模式等各方面的冲击，在学生、教师和环境层面都出现了一些与教改模式不协调的现象，传统大学英语课堂的生态平衡被打破，影响了教改模式的顺利实施。分析并解决这些失调问题，寻找生态化大学英语课堂教学优化途径变得意义重大。基于这个目标，本文要梳理并回答以下几个问题：（1）网络环境下大学英语课堂教学模式改革给大学英语课堂教学带来了哪些变化？（2）这些变化中的不协调因素是什么？（3）这些不协调因素的表现以及产生的根源是什么？(4）解决网络环境下大学英语课堂教学失调现象的理论和原则是什么？（5）怎样建设一个网络环境下大学英语课堂教学的优化框架？笔者以行为主义理论、认知主义理论、人本主义理论、建构主义理论为理论基础，首先通过研读文献，利用定性的方法详细阐述了论文的研究背景、意义、国内外相关研究现状以及计算机网络与大学英语课程整合的发展历程。其次，针对黑龙江省地方高校佳木斯大学网络环境下大学英语教学改革实际，通过问卷调查、实地考察、研读校本课改文件、深度访谈及课堂观察等实际研究方法和手段，从宏观角度了解该校计算机网络与大学英语课程整合的现状及师生在课程整合过程中遇到的难题，总结教学改革过程中网络环境下大学英语课堂教学中的失调表现，按照本文界定的网络环境下大学英语课堂概念：网络自主学习课堂、PPT面授课堂、网络课程选修课堂为研究调查范围，重点从学生、教师和课堂环境三个角度归纳大学英语课堂教学失调问题，分析失调的原因，挖掘影响网络教学模式成功建构的制约因素。（2012黑龙江省大学英语课程评估作为重要佐证材料）通过实证研究，失调现象可从学生、教师、环境等三个层面总结如下：1)学生层面的失调现象为:学生自主学习观念和能力不强；缺乏良好的信息素养；自主学习效果不佳（表现为：自主学习动机偏差；元认知策略缺失；出现情感焦虑现象；自主学习外部监控缺失）。2）教师层面的失调表现为:教师的教学信念与实际教学不符；教师信息意识与信息知识不匹配；教师课堂教学方法与现代信息技术应用失调。3）教学环境层面的失调表现为:网络教学硬件环境与改革模式不匹配；网络教学资源没有得到充分利用，个性化教学资源不足，教学平台智能化程度不高；大学英语教学评价与网络环境不协调；大学英语课程设置与教学目标和信息技术的应用不协调，网络选修课堂生态系统出现失衡现象等。最后，在教育生态学理论的指导下，根据教学优化五项基本原则，笔者在借鉴了众多学者研究成果的基础上，经过实证探索，试图构建一个“以教师发展、学生自主为核心，生态化课堂教学环境为支撑的大学英语课堂教学优化框架”。以此框架，笔者试图为网络环境下大学英语课堂教学的失调现象找到优化的途径。此框架涉及教师发展、学生自主和课堂教学环境生态化三个方面：（1）教师发展是指构建以优化教师教学观、教师信息素养、建立教学方法多元化理念为核心的现代化教师发展框架，以此框架进一步强化教师自我发展和终生学习的理念，并提出教师自主、智能化教师发展平台建设、完善机构培训以及师培内容信息化等四项重要支撑内容。（2）学生自主是指建立以优化学生自主学习观、信息素养、学习动机、自主学习策略为内涵的学生自主学习能力培养框架。笔者建议从“显性”“隐性”两个方面，对学生进行外语学习理论指导、学习策略培训；重视网络环境下学生自主学习情绪调节；提出了教师、班主任、教学管理员以及平台技术等全员参与的多元监控体系；创新地组成了一个网络环境下大学生自主学习英语的策略群，其中主要有5种大的策略范畴和12种网络环境下的自主学习策略分支。（3）生态化大学英语课堂教学环境构建是指优化硬件环境建设与服务、建设多元化、个性化、生态化软件环境的理念，提出了生态融合型多元课程设置、生态多元评价体系建设以及个性化教学资源、平台建设等见解。本文以教改模式中大学英语课堂教学的失调现象为切入点，在实证与思辨的基础上力求构建一个生态化大学英语课堂教学优化框架。本文研究成果对当前网络环境下大学英语课堂教学质量的提高、教改模式的完善具有实际的参考和借鉴价值，针对学生终身学习、教师发展的理念具有一定的促进作用。 [1] 马冲宇，陈坚林 基于虚拟现实的计算机辅助语言教学——理论、方法与技术[J] 外语电化教学 2012(06) [2] 隋晓冰，周天豪 外语教材的研发与学生外语能力的培养——基于我国高校主要外语教材的分析与探讨[J] 外语电化教学 2012(06) [3] 熊苏春 基于网络环境的大学生语言学习焦虑与学习策略使用之关系研究[J] 外语电化教学 2012(06) [4] 洪卫 高校外语课堂中PPT课件依赖问题的分析与思考[J] 外语电化教学 2012(06) [5] 康淑敏 教育生态视域下的外语教学设计[J] 外语界 2012(05) [6] 郭遂红，李方秀 大学英语网络考试对大学英语教师专业发展的反拨效应研究[J] 外语电化教学 2012(05) [7] 郭颖 论教育信息化在现代外语教学中的作用与实现途径[J] 现代远距离教育 2012(04) [8] 马利娟 多媒体网络环境下大学英语课堂教学的生态化解读[J] 湖南科技学院学报 2012(08) [9] 周文娟 基于云计算的英语泛在学习模态与学习资源研究[J] 远程教育杂志 2012(04) [10] 束定芳 大学英语教学大赛与教师发展——第二届“外教社杯”全国大学英语教学大赛评审手记[J] 外语界 2012(03)

1、针对你研究的某一个范围具体命题。如：中学教育，小学教育，职业教育等等。2、侧重某一个教学法进行论述和研讨。如：行动导向教学法。3、侧重对学生德育教育、思想教育开展论文研究。4、对某一领域的教学调研和调查。

关于法理学的论文题目有哪些英文

我有这些 妖气吧舞六久9久三

第一编参考文献7．[德]考夫曼、哈斯默尔主编．当代法哲学和法律理论导论．北京：法律出版社，2002．8．[美]博登海默．法理学——法律哲学与法律方法．北京：中国政法大学出版社，1999．9．[美]波斯纳．法理学问题．北京：中国政法大学出版社，2001．第二编参考文献．7．[英]哈特．法律的概念．北京：中国大百科全书出版社，1996．8．[奥]凯尔森．法与国家的一般理论．北京：中国大百科全书出版社，1996．9．[美]博登海默．法理学——法律哲学与法律方法．北京：中国政法大学出版社，1999．10．[美]德沃金．认真对待权利．北京：中国大百科全书出版社，1998．11．[美]L亨金．权利的时代．北京：知识出版社，1997．12．[美]贝勒斯．法律的原则．北京：中国大百科全书出版社，1996．13．[日]谷口安平．程序的正义与诉讼．北京：中国政法大学出版社，1996．14．[英]哈特．惩罚与责任．北京：华夏出版社，1989．第三编参考文献6．[德]马克思．摩尔根《古代社会》一书摘要．北京：人民出版社，1965．7．[美]霍贝尔．原始人的法．贵阳：贵州人民出版社，1992．8．[英]梅因．古代法．北京：商务印书馆，1959．9．[日]川岛武宜．现代化与法．北京：中国政法大学出版社，1994．第四编参考文献．20．[德]拉伦兹．法学方法论．五南图书出版公司(台湾)，1996．21．[德]迈耶．德国行政法．北京：商务印书馆，2002．22．[日]大木雅夫．比较法．北京：法律出版社，1999．23．[美]博登海默．法理学——法律哲学与法律方法．北京：中国政法大学出版社，1999．第五编参考文献10．[美]庞德．通过法律的社会控制 法律的任务．北京：商务印书馆，1984．11．[英]斯坦、香德．西方社会的法律价值．北京：中国人民公安大学出版社，1990．12．[英]米尔恩．人的权利与人的多样性——人权哲学．北京：中国大百科全书出版社，1995．13．[英]密尔．论自由．北京：商务印书馆，1986．14．[英]洛克．政府论（上、下篇）．北京：商务印书馆，1964．15．[法]孟德斯鸠．论法的精神（上、下册）．北京：商务印书馆，1963．16．[美]博登海默．法理学——法律哲学与法律方法．北京：中国政法大学出版社，1999．17．[美]罗尔斯．正义论．北京：中国社会科学出版社，1988．18．[美]麦金太尔．谁之正义？何种合理性？．北京：当代中国出版社，1996．19．[美]科斯．企业、市场和法律．上海：上海三联书店，1990．20．[美]波斯纳．法律的经济分析（上、下）．北京：中国大百科全书出版社，1997．第六编参考文献12．[法]孟德斯鸠．论法的精神（上、下册）．北京：商务印书馆，1963．13．[美]伯尔曼．法律与宗教．北京：三联书店，1991．14．[美]庞德．法律史解释．北京：中国法制出版社，2002．15．[英]科特威尔．法律社会学导论．北京：华夏出版社，1989．这是关于法理学的一些外文参考文献，我不知道你要的是文章还是一些书，这此就是书了

The subject is: a blatant crime on the criminal law of the theoretical knowledgeAbstract: a flagrant crime as a general social phenomenon， has been in existence for thousands of years of social history; including， in particular the concept of school as a flagrant crime committed， it can be said with the general sense of the crime have simultaneously; the concept of criminal law as a flagrant offenders has also been historically exist in human society a thousand Openly committed as a criminal and the negative cultural expressions， whether it is the specificity of the Criminal Code norms on moral values or the reverse， and are worthy of criminal law theory researchers to explore in However， for a long time， China's Criminal Law on the "objective elements constitute a crime，" the study focus， multi-objective aspects of running an essential element， that is against the act， against the findings and results of behavior and the causal relationship between on; for the crime as an objective choice of the implementation of elements of the crime the way， but rarely get In this paper， exploring a flagrant crime， not only confined to the study of criminal law perspective， but also learn from the crime， ethics， sociology， such as the perspective of the norms of a flagrant offense， the nature of black social evil， the negative value and its comprehensive evaluation Author through so many levels， multi-angle discussion to a more deepening and comprehensive three-dimensional interpretation that the truth will be openly committed to maximize the show in the face of social and readers， so expect it to for the development of China's Criminal Jurisprudence criminal applications of the research on the subject domain， to make its own modest Key words: flagrant flagrant crime

法理学，具体的与我说

关于法律的英语论文题目有哪些

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre， namely， refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law， whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by， or what is wrong， is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime， the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty， (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime， the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent， (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors， misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre， only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment， and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there， so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually （1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence， whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak， just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle， namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition， not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2）Should know the reason， according to two: moral responsibility theory， personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct， is considered to be objective 3）That said， the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately， at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland， the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known， the law itself is not damaged， the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime， illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore， our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence， which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness， with a social moral evaluation colour， easier for people to grasp and Therefore， the author thinks that， in general， the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society， and has already With intentionally But in fact， the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent， in other words， know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal， but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness， both are Therefore， it is generally thought that the law is no excuse， the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle， but can be culpable for deliberately （2） Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame， for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent， lack of this should blame or condemning sexual， from the fundamental measure， blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society， the legal category SAN marino， legal entry in different fields and different levels of books， recognized， comprehend legal apparently endless and same， so the person of law and misunderstandings， not Now， both in theory and practice， the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore， to a certain extent， can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition， it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations， especially after a circumstance， should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor， constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view， with the attitude of this understanding， of course， that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may， FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake， is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles， generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors， whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist， or for criminal object and actually does not exist， or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake， but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree， and in the nature of law is not Therefore， the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin， crime accomplishment， and may even attempted to influence the For example， in view of the circumstances， not a thought before the enemy， and a party came to stick， afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people"， and the actual wounded is "cow"， do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items， Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors， see， is a kind of mistake， From the objective， because the mistake crime to no avail， where the criminal attempted 1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake， including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include， is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects， namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here， the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects， namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object， but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve， killing b shall be killed as b and c， do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c)， belong to an intentional crime (b) "death"， for the excess result， according to the results， which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately， to the death of the fault is propylene， identified as negligence， according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind， not applicable rules of the 2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first， the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature， such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin， and may also affect Second， the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods)， which affects not correct understanding of harm results， behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded， also can affect crime or belongs to the incident， a typical for murder on hazardous substances， because the drug failure and failed to kill people， can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour， second coming together， hence shot to play， but can't hit by the party Look， this is from the phenomenon of an object， or the final results for the mistake， but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin， can think recognize is accurate， errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation， "said"， its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent， namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b， death is the indirect intentional， just for a to b is attempted， Additionally， if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences， the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake， is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first， not some harm result， as has happened This generally constitute a Second， has certain harm result， but not for actor or for his behavior is caused， and does not affect crime Third， really happened， the offender is aware of its behavior， but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake， general to punish crime In theory， the offender is not only a crime， but continuous movement， this several continuous action is not a few crime， but a In this sense， doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime， criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake，（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime， that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding， only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong， the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes， it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant， as this mistake to hit each other， the shooting head caused the death of heart， without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error， error occurs when the purpose， but whether to intentionally resistance， reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition， natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime， and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error， conviction according to Based on this， the author thinks that， at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error， but the problem is in the law， criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes)， or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content， to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong， is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity， administrative rules and regulations， JinYuOu， disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public， and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined， and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases， the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge， and not to the behavior of social harmfulness， so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society， and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime， the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution， in addition， prosecution without proof the defendant not normal， but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal， it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus， the author， on legal irrtumslehre processing， can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known， unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above， or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit， said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the

The Legal Language and style syntex

A paper on the realitionship between civil mediation and trial Abstact:(摘要) Court mediation and trial are the two ways to settle civil These two ways ，having different demands on entity，exist as independent The mediation proceeding and trial proceeding are combined to At present，our country is on the critical period of building harmonious socialist society，which put great challenge on the relationship between court mediation and court trial This paper ，basing on the similarities and differences between the two metioned above， analyze the relations between civil procedure mediation and 一些专业术语也不知道翻译的对不对，希望对你有所帮助