论文发表百科

有关法律英语的论文题目

发布时间:2024-07-01 16:10:02

有关法律英语的论文题目

A paper on the realitionship between civil mediation and trial Abstact:(摘要) Court mediation and trial are the two ways to settle civil two ways ,having different demands on entity,exist as independent systerm. The mediation proceeding and trial proceeding are combined to present,our country is on the critical period of building harmonious socialist society,which put great challenge on the relationship between court mediation and court trial .This paper ,basing on the similarities and differences between the two metioned above, analyze the relations between civil procedure mediation and trial.一些专业术语也不知道翻译的对不对,希望对你有所帮助

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.(1)Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1)Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2)Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3)That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. (2) Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but . The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:(1) Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted )Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the ) Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of )Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:(1)For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,(2)The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。(3)Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that:1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.

O. J. Simpson murder case辛普森杀妻案The O. J. Simpson murder case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in history,[1] in which O. J. Simpson, former American football star and actor, was brought to trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. Simpson was acquitted in 1995 after a lengthy trial, the longest jury trial in California history.[2]Simpson hired a high-profile defense team led by Johnnie Cochran and F. Lee Bailey. Los Angeles County believed it had a solid prosecution case, but Cochran created in the minds of the jury the belief that there was reasonable doubt about the DNA evidence (then a relatively new type of evidence in trials),[3] including that the blood-sample evidence had allegedly been mishandled by lab scientists and technicians.[4] Cochran and the defense team also alleged other misconduct by the Los Angeles Police Department. The televising of the lengthy trial riveted national attention on the dramatic case. By the end of the criminal trial, national surveys showed dramatic differences between most blacks and most whites in terms of their assessment of Simpson's guilt.[5]Later, both the Brown and Goldman families sued Simpson for damages in a civil trial, which has a lower standard of proof for determining responsibility.[citation needed] On February 5, 1997, the jury unanimously found there was a preponderance of evidence to find Simpson liable for damages in the wrongful death of Goldman and battery of Brown. In its conclusions, the jury effectively found Simpson liable for the death of his ex-wife and Ron Goldman.[6] On February 21, 2008, a Los Angeles court upheld a renewal of the civil judgment against him.这个案子很经典,上面的一段是wiki上的英文案例,你可以找一些关于这个的中文资料,然后选择一个角度(比如种族歧视与陪审团制度的矛盾、毒树之果原则、媒体和舆论与司法公正的矛盾等等),或者一篇参考的中文文章(很多中国的法律人也会研究这个案子,发表一些观点),自己写或者翻译一篇英文论文出来就是了。下面引用一段英文资料,有个人在提问,为什么法院在刑事诉讼中判决辛普森无罪,但是在民事诉讼中又判决他赔偿自己妻子死亡赔偿金。 Jeralyn Merritt对这个问题进行了简略的回答。我想你大一的论文,字数要求不会太多,所以参考一下他这段答复吧。如果字数不够就把上面wiki的资料加一些进去,简单的交待一下案情。Q. I am a high school government student, and I have a question that has been bothering me that my teacher refuses to answer. In the . Simpson case I know that the state jury did not find him guilty on the charge of murder, but the federal court did on the charge of wrongful death. What is the difference and why were they able to do that? -- Geni A. . Simpson was charged with first degree murder in the state court in California. The jury found him "Not Guilty." A "not guilty" verdict means the state failed to prove the charges "beyond a reasonable doubt", which is the standard of proof in all criminal prosecutions. Criminal cases are brought on behalf of the citizens of a particular state or federal district, not by the victims or their . Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal case, the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman sued him in the state (not federal) court in California for wrongfully causing their deaths. Civil lawsuits for wrongful death are tried for money damages, not to put the defendant in prison. Civil cases are brought in the name of individuals, not in the name of the evidence was introduced in the . Simpson civil and criminal trials. For example, although . Simpson denied it, evidence was presented in the civil trial that . Simpson owned a pair of Bruno Magli shoes that matched shoeprints left at the murder . Simpson exercised his constitutional right against self-incrimination and chose not to testify in the criminal trial. All defendants in criminal cases have this right. In the civil trial, . no longer had such a right because he had been found not guilty of murder and could not be tried again for it. He had to testify when the opposing side called him as a witness. Thus, the jury in the civil case got to hear 's testimony while the criminal jury did the criminal case, the jury got to see that the glove left at the scene of the crime did not fit . Simpson. This experiment was not repeated for the civil jury. The jury in the criminal trial got a far stronger portrayal of the problems with the DNA and other scientific evidence in the case, and the poor management of the crime scene, than did the civil jury. And the criminal jury got to hear the false testimony of Los Angeles police officer Mark Furman, who later admitted lying and pleaded guilty to , the burden of proof in criminal and civil cases is different. In criminal cases, the standard is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt." There is also a presumption of innocence that stays with the defendant until and unless the jury returns a guilty verdict. In civil cases, the standard of proof is "by a preponderance of the evidence," which essentially means "more likely than not," or put another way, proof by 51% or jury's verdict in the civil case was not that . Simpson was guilty of murder, but that he was liable for (which essentially means responsible for causing) the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron light of the different evidence presented, burdens of proof and ultimate issues the juries were called upon to decide, the verdicts in the criminal and civil trials were not really all that inconsistent. -- Jeralyn Merritt

英语和法律相关的论文题目

毕业 时期,英语专业论文写作成为热门,面对导师的严格要求,要想顺利通过论文答辩,拟定 一个优秀的英语专业论文题目必不可少。下面我给大家带来英语专业优秀论文题目_英语专业毕业论文选题,希望能帮助到大家!

↓↓↓点击获取更多"论文"相关内容↓↓↓

★ 英语专业毕业论文题目 ★

★ 英语教学法论文题目 ★

★ 毕业论文答辩发言稿 ★

★ 大学毕业论文评语 ★

英语本科论文题目

1、汉语对 英语写作 词汇的负迁移作用

2、《美国悲剧》的消费 文化 分析

3、从二语习得角度对比分析英语习语学习中的翻译导向模式与文化导向模式

4、礼貌原则在英文商务信函中的应用

5、南方哥特式小说特征在《心是孤独的猎手》中的体现

6、城市公示语的汉译英探索

7、归化与异化理论在汉语 歇后语 翻译中的应用

8、《婚礼的成员》中弗兰淇?亚当斯双性同体现象的研究

9、论《喜福会》中的文化冲突与共存

10、 广告 语言模糊性的语用研究

11、利用美剧进行 英语听力 自主学习

12、大学生 英语口语 学习动机研究

13、从文化视角看中国白酒广告

14、从功能翻译看《围城》英译本中文化信息的传递

15、对《达罗卫夫人》中克莱丽莎和塞普提默斯形象的研究

16、公示语汉译英错误及对策探析

17、探究美国安利公司的 企业文化 :基于其网站内容的文本分析

18、运用写长法促进英语写作能力的提高

19、中美“面子文化”对比分析

20、英汉恭维语和告别语的对比分析

21、英汉爱情隐喻的对比研究

22、新闻英语汉译的翻译技巧浅析

23、中美家庭文化比较

24、从文化的角度浅析中美企业 人力资源管理 的差异

25、华中农业大学英语专业学生高级 英语学习 状况调查

26、跨文化交际中中西方馈赠礼仪刍议

27、解读《双城记》中的人道主义思想

28、论《了不起的盖茨比》中的消费主义

29、从戴姆勒克莱斯勒事件看文化因素对跨国企业合并的影响

30、对中美离岸外包过程中跨文化交际案例的分析

31、从"老友记"中看合作原则在英语称赞语及其回应语中的应用

32、浅论美国文化与美语词汇 98 英汉植物词语联想意义的跨文化对比

33、一个被忽视的“准则英雄”--论《永别了,武器》中的女主人公凯瑟琳

34、从文化的角度看中美商务谈判风格的差异

35、英语娱乐新闻的文体特点

36、自然主义视野中《儿子与情人》主人公保罗的性格分析

37、美国价值观对《老友记》中主要角色的影响

38、中西文化中礼貌语的对比研究

39、广告双关语的作用

40、中美交流思维模式的差异

41、浅析《灶神之妻》中的多元文化主义

42、合作原则在英语商务信函中的应用

43、透过“超女现象” 反思 美国大众文化对中国传统精英文化的影响

44、中西方文化差异与英语教学

45、中西方文化差异及其对科学技术发展的影响

46、中西方文化差异对翻译的影响

47、中西方文化差异点滴

48、中西方送礼与受礼文化之差异

49、中西方思维差异与写作风格对比分析

50、中西方企业理财环境的差异分析

51、中西方广告创意水平差异刍议

52、中西方管理者收购差异及其在中国实施的建议

53、中西方古代哲学思维的差异及对音乐的影响

54、中西方古代对天体变速运动的认识差异

55、试论中西文化差异与对外汉语教学

56、求职网络的性别差异:以失业群体为例---兼论社会资本的中西差

57、浅议中西古典园林的起源及差异

58、谈中西文化差异与翻译

59、浅谈中西绘画的差异

60、中西选举制度的差异及其相关性

优秀 商务英语 本科论文题目

1、商务英语的特点及翻译技巧

2、商务英语函电翻译技巧

3、商务英语学习中跨文化交际能力的培养

4、国际商务谈判中应注意的文化因素

5、商务谈判中的跨文化冲突

6、试论普通英语与商务英语的差异

7、商务谈判中的语言艺术

8、试论文化因素对商务活动的作用

9、电子商务对国际贸易的影响及对策

10、从文化视角比较中英文广告语言

11、国际商务英语信函话语分析

12、经贸英语的语言特点

13、浅论经贸英语的文体风格

14、经贸英语的语体特点与翻译

15、英语在商务活动中的作用

16、经贸英语在中国加入WTO后的新趋势

17、商务英语学习中的文化习得

18、浅谈如何有效学习经贸英语词汇

19、文化习俗与跨文化交际学对经贸英语学习的影响

20、商务英语专业人才培养模式改革与实践

21、试论文化导入在商务英语教学中的作用

22、中英文广告传播之语言特色及跨文化问题

23、商品译文的品牌形象对商务英语翻译教学的启示

24、试论商务英语写作的简洁礼貌原则及写作技巧

25、现代商务英语书信的写作风格和语法特点

26、从修辞方面浅探商务英语的语言特色

27、商务英语书面语篇词汇特点分析

28、从语境角度分析英汉互译中语言的得体

29、商务英语函电的文本特征

30、经贸英语合同的语言特色

31、商务合同英语的文体特征分析

32、经贸英语信函话语基调分析

33、中西文化差异与交际障碍

34、试谈语言交际中的文化差异

35、文化差异对经贸英语翻译的影响

36、经贸英汉互译中的矛盾与对策

37、经贸英语词汇特点与翻译

38、根据词义和逻辑关系谈涉外经济合同的翻译

39、商业 英文书信 所使用的 词语分类 浅析

40、一些普通词汇在经贸英语中的特殊意义及翻译

41、常用名词在经贸英语中的语义变化特征

42、浅谈经贸英语会话中的言语交际技巧

43、论国际经贸活动的语言交际技巧

44、跨文化交际中的非言语交际体系研究

45、文化差异对国际商务的影响

46、国际商务谈判中的文化差异

47、试论广告英语的语言特点

48、关于网络广告英语与报刊杂志广告英语词汇比较

49、商号、商标、公司名称等的翻译?

50、商标名称的美学特征及汉语商标名称的翻译

优秀英语专业毕业论文题目

1、航海英语教学中培养跨文化交际能力的意义

2、医学检验专业双语教学的思考

3、“微时代”下的军事 医学英语 微课教学研究

4、浅析中医五行学说一些术语的英译

5、传统美学视角下的 散文 翻译中情感美的传递

6、目的论视角下的文学翻译策略研究——以《红楼梦》两个英文译本为例

7、茅盾文学奖获奖作品的翻译研究价值——以《穆斯林的葬礼》为例

8、《长恨歌》中认知隐喻的翻译

9、高罗佩《武则天四大奇案》英译之诗学探析

10、诗歌翻译中的“意、音、形”之美——唐诗《江雪》四种英译的对比分析

11、《红楼梦》角色姓名“归化”译法探究

12、论戏剧翻译的可表演性原则

13、《越人歌》的审美再现——从语内翻译到语际翻译

14、早期西方汉学家英译《聊斋志异》中的跨文化操纵

15、“西语哲”视域下的英汉 句子 形态的差异及启示

16、中英文日常交际用语的差异探析

17、网络环境下英语教学模式改革初探

18、基于图式理论的高职商务英语专业听力作业设计研究

19、翻译工作坊教学模式研究

20、高校英语教学中目的语文化的渗透和本族语文化的回归研究

21、新课改下高校 教育 硕士(英语)培养模式的探索与反思

22、中小学英语衔接工作的探索与实践

23、信息技术与高校英语教学整合研究

24、探究基于计算机辅助模式的大学英语课堂教学情感因素

25、开元数字化平台大学英语教学模式研究——基于建构主义理论

26、非英语专业大学英语教师课堂话语的互动特征分析——以实习教师课堂为例

27、西部农村中学英语写作在线同伴反馈和教师反馈的对比研究

28、基于网络的高职英语自主学习生态化研究'))));基于网络的高职英语自主学习生态化研究

29、小学英语课堂激励 方法 的应用策略研究

30、高中英语以读促写的“读写一体化”教学模式探究

31、研究生英语学术论文语体特征多维度对比分析

32、MOOC下的中国职业英语教育改革探索与应对

33、初中英语教学策略初探

34、西北地区初中生英语自主学习浅见

35、浅议小学英语教学中的词汇教学

36、试析模块教学法在中职酒店英语教学中的应用

37、英语词汇增长路线图理论研究

38、语法及语法教学:从知识到技能的转变——D.拉森-弗里曼的语法观及语法教学刍议

39、周作人的直译观及其嬗变

40、新教学环境下的英语专业第二课堂建设分析

41、论翻转课堂模式下英语课堂提问策略的转变

42、支架式教学模式对中职英语教学的启示

43、基于“输出驱动假设”的警务英语教学策略研究

44、跨文化交际意识对商务英语翻译的影响

45、从目的论视角浅谈英文电影片名中译

46、浅析英语新闻标题的翻译

47、论《论语》英译中的语用充实

48、翻译目的论视角下的汉语典籍英译——以《论语》英译为例

49、英美影视作品中“神翻译”的定义及方法探析

50、电影片名翻译的跨文化解读

51、“讨论”与“演讲”相结合的大学英语课堂教学实践

52、单词 配对 法对双语词汇翻译的影响

53、素质教育视野下农村中小学教师心理资本开发与学生英语学习的关系

54、硕士研究生公共英语课程的元认知策略

55、语境中语块的加工及其影响因素——以中级汉语学习者为例

56、激发和培养学生英语学习兴趣之管见

57、浅谈如何提高小学英语教学质量

58、如何更好地利用多媒体辅助英语教学

59、平行文本视域下的企业简介汉英翻译策略研究

60、文化差异的导入对大学英语教学的意义

英语专业优秀论文题目相关 文章 :

★ 英语专业优秀论文题目

★ 优秀英语毕业论文题目参考

★ 英语专业方向的论文题目

★ 本科英语专业毕业论文题目

★ 英语专业毕业论文选题文化

★ 英语专业文化类方面毕业论文题目选题

★ 本科英语专业毕业论文题目选题

★ 2021英语专业各方向论文题目

★ 英语教学论文题目选题参考整理

★ 英语专业不同方向的毕业论文题目

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.(1)Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1)Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2)Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3)That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. (2) Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but . The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:(1) Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted )Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the ) Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of )Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:(1)For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,(2)The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。(3)Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that:1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.

选什么主题不都可以吗,这有什么,你又不是法律翻译专业非得是翻译方面的,或者非得选某个方向。

.好.多学习讥构比如:ABC天卞英语中心 都会先让你做个英语测试,很喜欢这里的老师,客服都很热心,我觉得在线的方式性介比较高,你也可以找几个了解一下吧..

英语法律论文题目

你准备写跨文化交际还是翻译,还是文学,还是其他的?

提供一些英语专业的毕业论文题目,供参考。

学术堂整理了十五个好写的英语专业毕业论文题目供大家进行参考:1. 英语中的性别歧视(Sex Discrimination in English Language )2. 电影《乱世佳人》长期受到青睐的原因(Gone with the Wind – Why This Movie Has the Lasting Popularity)3. 广告英语特点分析(An Analysis of Language Features in English Advertisement)4. 美国青少年教育问题浅析(An Attempting Study of the Problems of American Adolescents)5. 简爱自我价值的实现(The Realization of Jane Eyre’s Self-Worth )6. 自由贸易与保护主义(Free Trade Versus Protectionism)7. 如何在课堂上调动学生的积极性(How to Promote Motivation in the Classroom)8. 在英语教学中运用“交际法”提高学生的交际能力(Using CLT in English Teaching to Improve Students’ Communicative Competence)9. 文化差异对跨文化交际的影响(The Influence of Cultural Difference Upon Cross-cultural Communication)10. 论基督教对中世纪早期西欧文化的影响(On Christianity’s Influence Upon European Culture in the Early-stage Middle Ages )11. 《哈克贝利费恩历险记》是一部种族主义小说吗?(The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn-a Racist Novel?)12. 第二语言学习中的文化学习(Culture Learning in Second Language Learning)13. 试论哈姆雷特的两个主题(On the Two Themes of Hamlet)14. 谚语中的文化差异(Cultural Differences in Proverbs)15. 浅谈电视暴力和儿童的关系(TV Violence and Children)

一个好的英语专业论文题目既是指定一个研究的方向,也是一个新的学习领域。你会像一叶小舟,尽情游弋在知识的海洋中。下面我给大家带来2022英语专业各方向论文题目参考,希望能帮助到大家!

↓↓↓点击获取更多"论文"相关内容↓↓↓

★ 英语专业毕业论文题目 ★

★ 英语教学法论文题目 ★

★ 毕业论文答辩发言稿 ★

★ 大学毕业论文评语 ★

中学英语论文题目参考

1、中学英语课堂互动教学的策略研究

2、论中学英语课堂有效教学目标的设置

3、浅谈中学英语词汇教学

4、中学英语教学中“跨 文化 意识”的缺失及对策

5、浅谈中学英语课堂中的母语文化教学

6、农村初中英语教师专业能力调查研究--以福建漳州某农村中学为例

7、论中学英语教学中学生的口语表达能力

8、中学英语课堂有效提问的基本原则

9、中学英语教学中运用现代信息技术的原则探析

10、角色换位法在中学英语课堂教学中的实施

11、能力导向的中学英语课堂教学模式及策略探究

12、中学英语教学与交互式电子白板整合应用研究

13、农村初中学困生英语厌学心理初探

14、浅谈中学英语 教育 学科目标

15、浅析中学英语教学中语言学习策略的训练

16、中学英语教学跨文化意识培养分析

17、中学英语教师必备素质研究

18、口语能力提升与中学英语教学

19、优化中学 英语阅读 教学的实践研究

20、从传播学角度看中学英语教育对实用 英语学习 的影响

21、中学 英语口语 教学 方法 探索

22、浅谈如何提高中学英语阅读水平

23、浅议如何提高农村中学“学困生”英语学习兴趣

24、浅谈中学英语语法填空的解题技巧

25、论高效中学英语教学模式的构建

26、中学英语校本课程的开发与探索

27、中学 英语写作 教学的动态评估体系建构

28、中学英语课堂教学中要体现人文关怀

29、基于语料库的中学英语学习者写作句法复杂性变化研究

30、中学英语课堂中发散性思维的培养与应用

31、文化生态视域下英语教师学历与能力应和谐统一--基于海南民族地区中学英语师资结构的调查 报告

32、探究中学英语有效阅读的教法

33、关于中学英语阅读教学维度的思考

34、农村中学英语课堂评价策略

35、中学英语教学中文化因素的作用

36、朝鲜族中学英语教学情境创设探究

37、生态教学环境下农村中学英语教师专业化发展的思考

38、浅谈中学英语中常见的修辞方法

39、河南省中学英语教师职前阶段专业知识的建构

40、提高中学 英语单词 教学有效性的策略探析

41、小说素材在中学英语教学中的有效教学途径探究

42、基于交互模式的中学英语语法教学研究

43、谈中学英语教学中的“生态课堂”

44、浅谈多媒体应用在中学英语教学中的优越性

45、基于概念整合理论的中学英语中介语整合模式研究

46、中学英语教学中教具的恰当选择

47、浅谈中学英语翻译的技巧

48、走出中学英语教学中多媒体运用的误区

49、中学英语兴趣教学的新途径分析

50、试论中学英语课堂教学评价的有效构建

前沿学术英语论文题目参考

1、浅议系统功能语言学理论指导下的英语专业学术论文摘要的翻译

2、“教学学术”视角下开放大学英语教师专业发展的思考

3、课程生态需求分析模式下的“学术英语”课程定位

4、CBI理论视域下学术英语读写教学研究

5、基于微课的通用学术英语写作课翻转课堂教学模式设计与实践

6、基于课堂读写任务的学术英语写作引用特征研究

7、基于语类的英语学术论文写作教学路径研究--以“文献综述”写作教学为例

8、基于需求分析学术英语教学模式

9、学术英语阅读能力的界定与培养

10、学术英语的词块教学法研究

11、英语专业本科 毕业 论文学术失范现象的成因与对策

12、浅析批判性思维下大学学术英语课程模块的构建

13、关于中文学术期刊使用英语的规范性问题

14、医学学术英语口语课程构建的探索

15、学术英语写作中词汇衔接探究

16、学习者学术英语写作中的引用行为研究

17、浅探理工院校学术英语改革实践

18、学术论文写作中的英语负迁移现象研究

19、学术英语写作教学体系的构建与实践

20、学术英语口头报告对批判性思维的影响探究

21、“学术读写素养”范式与学术英语写作课程设计

22、中国高校学术英语存在理论依据探索

23、学术英语教育对大学生就业的影响研究

24、学术道德教育和学术英语能力一体化培养

25、非英语专业研究生学术英语交际能力现状与对策研究--以延安大学为例

26、关于研究生学术英语教学定位研究

27、理工科学术英语视野下的批判性思维能力培植

28、面向学术英语的实验平台建构与探索

29、学术英语有效教学

30、学术英语写作课程环境下的写前计划效应探究

31、元话语视角下英语学术论文中的转述动词与语类结构研究

32、基于自建语料库的学术英语中语块结构的研究

33、以学术英语为新定位的大学英语教学转型问题的对策研究

34、跨文化背景下的中西方英语学术论文写作差异

35、学术英语背景下的大学英语听说教学

36、农学 专业英语 学术词汇概念的区别及释义

37、专门用途英语学术词表创建研究--以航海英语为例

38、基于语料库的学术英语写作教学研究

39、英语专业本科生学术诚信教育的实现路径

40、谈从通用英语向学术英语转型的必要性

41、面向学术英语教改的大学英语教师专业发展方向与路径研究

42、以学术英语为新定位的大学英语教学转型--问题和对策研究

43、学术英语写作的语言风格探究

44、学术英语写作的专属性

45、大学英语转型背景下“学术英语”课程模块的构建

46、从中外合作大学学术英语教学看大学英语教学改革--以西交利物浦大学为例

47、理工科研究生英语学术写作困难研究

48、医学本科生英语学习中学术阅读的质性调查研究

49、学术论文中英语本族语者与非本族语者的元话语比较分析

50、整合研究生英语能力和学术能力的项目式教学模式

金融英语 论文题目

1、金融英语课程教学改革探析

2、金融英语词汇的语义变迁探析

3、浅析微课在金融英语口语教学中的应用

4、金融英语的语言特点及翻译策略

5、高职院校金融英语教学现状分析及对策研究

6、刍议应用型本科院校金融英语教学改革研究

7、转型期高职英语应用型人才培养模式研究--以辽宁金融职业学院为例

8、金融英语与金融全球化竞争

9、高职专科类金融专业英语教学研究

10、概念整合理论视角下的金融英语词汇学习-以金融术语为例

11、基于语料库的英语经济语篇中隐喻的研究--以金融危机报道为例

12、高职高专金融英语教学现状及对策探究

13、 商务英语 专业学生的词块学习与教学策略研究--以辽宁金融职业学院为例

14、基于福建绿色经济的发展研发金融英语校本课程探究

15、金融英语词汇的特点及其翻译

16、金融转型背景下从业人员岗位英语能力强化路径探索

17、金融英语的词性转换研究

18、浅析以多模态理论为基础的金融英语教学

19、金融英语教学策略创新与金融双语教学共生性研究

20、翻译生态环境视角下金融英语新闻的汉译研究

21、高职院校中外合作办学项目英语教学探究--以长春金融高等专科学校为例

22、高职 英语文化 教育提升学生人文素质的策略探究--以辽宁金融职业学院为例

23、金融英语术语汉英翻译研究

24、专业人才培养视阈下的金融英语教学探究

25、国际化就业环境下的金融英语应用模式研究

26、对等理论观照下金融英语隐喻翻译的喻体形象取舍策略

27、基于ESP理论的金融英语教学改革初探

28、浅谈金融英语翻译基本特点

29、基于平行双语语料库金融英语翻译课程教学模式探索

30、多媒体网络环境下金融英语教学模式探析

31、语境在金融英语词汇教学中的应用探析

32、形成性评价在大学英语拓展课程中的应用初探--以金融英语视听说为例

33、金融学专业金融英语教学实践的探索

34、金融英语词汇特征浅析

35、金融英语汉译技巧探究

36、独立学院大学英语教学模式与策略探究--以某大学商学院为例

37、 财经 英语新闻语料库的建设构想与教学应用

38、大数据时代商务英语人才培养模式分析

39、互联网金融环境下高职金融专业课程体系构建

40、目的论视角下的金融术语翻译研究

41、商务英语专业学生学习动机及学习策略相关性研究

42、独立学院商务英语专业“双师型”师资队伍建设研究

43、释意理论下提高商务英语口译质量的应对策略研究

44、基于学生需求分析的商务英语课程设置研究

45、金融专业英语听说课程3S行动导向教学探索

46、基于自贸区需求的国际贸易双语人才培养模式探讨

47、提升商务英语实践教学质量研究

48、商务英语的语言特征及其翻译技巧

49、学业用途英语中MOOC的效能研究

50、大数据时代金融人才培养方式探析

51、基于需求分析的商务英语CBI课程实证研究

52、全球化背景下财经类院校学生英语学习环境研究--以上海金融学院为例

53、国家战略视域下的法律英语人才培养

54、培养高校综合型金融人才

55、基于航海院校商务英语人才培养的思考

56、金融学专业双语教学探析

57、金融翻译的英汉对比研究

58、试论如何把握商务英语的语言特点及翻译技巧

59、从财经新闻英译汉看财经英语长句的翻译策略

60、改写理论视角下英语硬新闻编译研究

2022英语专业各方向论文题目相关 文章 :

★ 2022毕业论文题目来源

★ 2022法学专业毕业论文题目

★ 2022最新数学方向毕业论文题目

★ 2022英语教研组计划最新大全10篇

★ 2022行政管理毕业论文选题题目

★ 2022年终总结(50篇)

★ 2022教学年终总结50篇

★ 2022教师教学工作总结报告(通用10篇)

★ 2022教学科研工作总结

★ 2022教师学期教学总结模板五篇

论文有关法律的题目

民事诉讼的可以写刑法的也行,挺多的

本人可以做,可以私下交流。

1.西方法哲学家思想评述 2.法学方法论问题研究 3.大陆法系与英美法系比较研究 4.以人为本的法律观问题研究 5.和谐社会法律问题研究 6.社会主义法治理念探究 7.法治的代价、弊端问题研究 8.法治与中国现代化问题研究 9.中国法治道路问题研究 10.法律正义、自由、安全、秩序、效率等价值问题研究 11.法律解释问题研究 12.法律规范与法律原则研究(冲突、协调等) 13.现代法的精神和理念研究 14.公民权利保障的问题研究 15.法律维权新形式、新问题研究 16.权力制衡问题研究 17.预防腐败的法律机制研究 18.信访制度问题研究 19.立法监督问题研究 20.立法活动过程问题研究 21.立法博弈问题研究 22.公众参与立法问题研究 23.法律职业共同体研究 24.司法改革问题研究 25.司法独立问题研究 26.市场经济与法制问题研究 27.法律思维问题研究 28.法律意识与法律信仰问题研究 29.法与道德的冲突及解决机制研究

要想写出一篇优秀的 毕业 论文,少不了论文拥有一个新颖的题目,论文题目足够有吸引力能够顺利答辩评审老师。那么关于法学相关专业的论文题目有哪些呢?下面我给大家带来2021法学相关专业的论文题目与选题方向,希望能帮助到大家!

刑法论文题目选题参考

1、刑事立法应力戒情绪

2、论中国贪污受贿犯罪死刑的立法控制及其废止

3、中立的帮助行为

4、网络空间中犯罪帮助行为的制裁体系与完善思路

5、累犯从严量刑适用实证研究

6、罪数论与竞合论探究

7、我国反恐刑事立法的检讨与完善

8、论《刑法》第383条之修正

9、窃取网络虚拟财产行为定性探究

10、言论自由与刑事犯罪

11、刑事立法:在目的和手段之间

12、论帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪

13、也谈《刑法修正案(九)》关于贪污贿赂犯罪的修改

14、贪污贿赂犯罪司法解释:刑法教义学的阐释

15、编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪的制裁思路

16、扰乱法庭秩序罪的修订:以律师为视角的评判

17、《刑法修正案(九)》的犯罪控制策略视野评判

18、从业禁止制度的定位与资格限制、剥夺制度的体系化

19、贪污贿赂犯罪最新定罪量刑标准体系化评析

20、刑法中“致人死亡”的类型化研究

21、论警察防卫行为正当性的判断

22、旅游型海岛的犯罪现象:鼓浪屿案例研究

23、交叉式法条竞合关系下的职务侵占罪与盗窃罪

24、共谋射程理论与共犯关系脱离的认定

25、犯罪的定义对犯罪构成边界之限制

26、违法相对性理论的崩溃

27、论共犯关系脱离的具体认定与法律责任

28、P2P网贷与金融刑法危机及其应对

29、自首与立功竞合时该如何认定问题研究

30、组织、领导传销活动罪:性质与界限

31、外来人口、户籍制度与刑事犯罪

32、犯罪竞合中的法益同一性判断

33、当代中国“校园暴力”的法律缺位与应对

34、刑法总则的修改与检讨

35、污染环境罪的罪过形式研究

36、义务犯理论的 反思 与批判

37、结果的推迟发生与既遂结论的质疑

38、非法集资行为的法律规制:理念检视与路径转换

39、克服正当防卫判断中的“道德洁癖”

40、不作为因果关系的理论流变与研究进路

41、行贿受贿惩治模式的博弈分析与实践检验

42、论我国想象竞合的规则及其限制

43、客观归责论再批判与我国刑法过失论的完善

44、论刑法中的精神病辩护规则

45、刑法职业禁止令的性质及司法适用探析

46、传统与现代:死刑改革与公众“人道”观念的转变

47、新刑法工具主义批判与矫正

48、酌定量刑情节法定化的路径选择及评析

49、论间接结果及其扩张刑罚功能之限制

50、立法论视角下嫖宿幼女罪废除之分析

法学毕业论文题目参考

1、法治与国家治理现代化

2、论法治中国的科学含义

3、法治社会建设论纲

4、“法不禁止皆自由”的私法精义

5、加快法治建设促进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化

6、中国语境中的法律实践概念

7、软法研究的多维思考

8、地 方法 治建设及其评估机制探析

9、法律人思维的二元论兼与苏力商榷

10、论法律视域下社会公权力的内涵、构成及价值

11、法教义学的应用

12、论国家治理现代化框架下的财政基础理论建设

13、“善治”视野中的国家治理能力及其现代化

14、论改革与法治的关系

15、全面推进法制改革,加快法治中国建设--十八届三中全会精神的法学解读

16、全面深化改革与全面推进依法治国关系论纲

17、依法治国与推进国家治理现代化

18、全球治理视野下的国际法治与国内法治

19、中国法治指数设计的理论问题

20、论协商民主在宪法体制与法治中国建设中的作用

21、法治评估及其中国应用

22、共和国法治认识的逻辑展开

23、我国上位法与下位法内容相关性实证分析

24、媒体负面报道、诉讼风险与审计费用

25、当代中国法治实践中的“法民关系”

26、中国法学研究格局的流变

27、社科法学及其功用

28、法学研究进路的分化与合作--基于社科法学与法教义学的考察

29、论中国法治评估的转型

30、“失败者正义”原则与弱者权益保护

31、逻辑与修辞:一对法学研究范式的中西考察

32、建设中国特色社会主义法治体系

33、社科法学的传统与挑战

34、建构法治体系是推进国家治理现代化的基础工程

35、全球化时代比较法的优势与缺陷

36、“法治中国”建设的问题与出路

37、论社会权的经济发展价值

38、法治精神的属性、内涵与弘扬

39、法律人思维中的规范隐退

40、法学研究及其 思维方式 的思想变革

41、当代中国法治话语体系的构建

42、新中国法学发展规律考

43、立法与改革:以法律修改为重心的考察

44、法律 教育 的起源:兼议对当下中国法律教育改革的启示

45、法律程序为什么重要?反思现代社会中程序与法治的关系

46、中国法治指数设计的思想维度

47、法律世界观紊乱时代的司法、民意和政治--以李昌奎案为中心

48、中国法治评估进路之选择

49、全面推进依法治国的伟大纲领--对十八届四中全会精神的认知与解读

50、对“法治思维和法治方式”的诠释

电子商务法论文题目

1、 电子商务法律制度专题研讨--电子商务法律制度的内核

2、 我国电子商务法律制度构建研究

3、 电子商务立法若干问题研究

4、 电子商务法律问题研究

5、 电子商务税收法律规制研究

6、 WTO框架下的电子商务法律问题

7、 论我国电子商务法律体系的基本架构

8、 关于完善我国电子商务法律制度的设想

9、 中日韩电子商务法律环境比较及启示

10、 借鉴美国立法 经验 完善我国电子商务法律体系

11、 电子商务法律环境的构建

12、 电子商务法律制度研究

13、 假货治理在电商时代遭遇的法律困境及其应对

14、 我国电子商务立法的国际接轨与中国特色

15、 出口导向下跨境电商的法律风险防范

16、 电子商务领域知识产权权利警告的规制

17、 我国电子商务法律规制的缺失及完善路径

18、 第三方跨境电子支付服务法律体系及监管问题研究

19、 我国电子商务发展与电子商务法的互动关系研究

20、 电子商务平台性质与法律责任

21、 我国电子商务法律机制的构建

22、 浅议电子商务法律体系的构建

23、 电子商务法律救助体系构建研究

24、 网络消费者知情权的法律保护

25、 浅析网络消费者权益之法律保护

26、 论电子商务与传统商务法律的冲突与协调

27、 我国电子商务税收法律立法现状及对策

28、 中国电子商务纠纷在线治理研究

29、 消费者网购现状与法律保障机制的建立

30、 中国电子商务信用法律体系的完善

31、 网络团购的法律关系及规范化建议

32、 电子商务领域反不正当竞争法律规制

33、 电子商务的发展与民商法的创新

34、 论电子商务中消费者求偿权的法律保护

35、 网络购物维权的困境及法律救济

36、 电子商务法律问题的研究现状及发展评析

37、 中国电子商务法律框架构建及应对方略

38、 GATS中的电子商务法律规则研究

39、 医药电子商务的法律规制探究

40、 我国电子商务税收法律立法现状及对策分析

41、 法律视角下电子商务退货运费险费率问题

42、 浅析电子商务领域犯罪及其对策研究

43、 电子商务中信用炒作行为的法律规制研究

44、 论电子商务中消费者权益保护的法律问题

45、 法律视野中的电子商务第三方支付平台

46、 中国电子商务法治时代来临

47、 论电子商务中消费者知情权的法律保护

48、 现行电子商务法规机制研究

49、 大学生网购纠纷及对策研究--以在杭高校为例

50、 论电子商务税收征管的法律问题

51、 浅析电子商务中有关消费者权益保护的法律问题

52、 电子商务企业的法律风险及防范

53、 法律视角下网络团购中消费者权益的保护

54、 电子商务市场交易规则的法理分析

55、 第三方支付法律问题研究

56、 国际经贸电子商务对中医药贸易实务的影响及相关问题研究

57、 论我国农产品电子商务法律保护的路径

58、 C2C交易模式下的物流法律纠纷

59、 电子商务中不正当竞争行为及法律机制分析

60、 我国电子商务企业税收征管的现状及建议

法学相关专业的论文题目与选题方向相关 文章 :

★ 最新法学专业论文题目选题大全

★ 法学专业本科论文题目大全

★ 法学专业毕业论文题目大全

★ 法学论文题目大全

★ 法学毕业论文题目大全

★ 法学热点论文题目有哪些

★ 年法律专业本科毕业论文题目选题(2)

★ 法学专业毕业论文题目

★ 法学本科开题报告范文

★ 法学开题报告范文精选5篇

有关法律刑法的论文题目

学术堂整理了十五个好写的刑法论文题目供你进行参考:1、论财产罪的非法占有目的2、从刑事责任理论到责任主义--一个学术史的考察3、侵占罪疑难问题研究4、中国逐步废止死刑论纲5、论盗窃故意的认识内容6、美国有组织犯罪观念的变迁及其启示7、海峡两岸犯罪停止形态立法比较研究8、我国反恐怖主义立法完善研讨9、死刑实证研究之死刑观的调查报告10、我国死刑适用标准的缺陷及其弥补方法11、论我国惩治腐败犯罪刑事立法的完善12、论犯罪构成与犯罪阻却事由的关系13、中日涉罪之轻微行为处理模式比较研究14、关于刑法情节显著轻微规定的思考15、非法实施专利行为入罪论

论罪责刑相适应原则。当初我们班写这个的基本都是高分。切入点很多、例如我国罪责刑原则的贯彻执行很不到位、究其原因、我国的程序审查和监督漏洞。要体现罪责刑相适应原则、在我国现今社会背景下、如何认定社会危害程度。罪责刑中的刑事责任并非指犯罪的法律后果的刑事责任、而指的是犯罪人的人身危险性。罪责刑相适应原则对刑事立法和司法的重要意义、和对于解释刑法的制约作用。等等、很多……这个题目、经过查阅资料和归纳总结、还可以让你对整个刑罚体系和精神内涵有进一步的、清晰的了解。一举两得啊~~~~

刑法论文选题有很多:1.罪刑法定的当代命运(罪刑法定原则哲学根据探究,罪刑法定的司法适用,罪刑法定与扩张解释的关系,罪刑法定视角中的中国司法解释)2.刑法的空间效力探疑(论刑法的空间效力的普遍原则与打击国际犯罪)3.试论刑法的溯及力4.犯罪本质的学理之争与司法选择5.法益概念在中国刑法中之地位探讨6.不作为犯罪的机理(论不作为犯罪中的作为义务来源,论不纯正不作为犯)7.论刑法中持有型犯罪的立法意义8.试论刑法中的因果关系9.精神病人的刑事责任能力辨析10.变态人格在刑事责任能力认定上的意义11.醉酒者的刑事责任能力探究12.试论刑法上的身份犯13.评我国刑法中的单位犯罪及立法建议14.信赖原则与犯罪过失理论15.试论刑法中的目的犯16.刑法上的认识错误的处断原则探讨(论事实认识错误,论法律认识错误,论正当防卫/紧急避险中的认识错误)17.试论期待可能性与中国刑法18.试论正当防卫的正当化根据(论特殊防卫权的适用,论正当防卫的程度限制要件,论防卫过当的认定与刑事责任)19.紧急避险的理论辨析(论对无责任能力者防卫的刑法定性,论紧急避险主体的排除性规定,论紧急避险的程度限制要件)20.论预备犯在刑法中的地位(论预备犯的处罚根据,论国外刑法上的预备罪对我国的借鉴意义)21.试论共同过失犯罪22.试论教唆犯的构成条件(论教唆自杀的刑事责任,论教唆未遂——兼评我国刑法第29条第2款,论教唆犯与间接正犯的区别)23.论牵连犯在刑法中的地位24.报应主义与预防主义的刑罚目的之争25.试论我国刑罚体系的完善(论刑罚体系的构建原则,论刑罚体系与行政处罚的协调)26.死刑正当性辨析(论死刑的刑罚根据:报应与预防,论死刑的威慑效应,论死刑的立法限制,论死刑的司法限制,废除死刑的中国路径,死刑与民意的关系,死刑存废与文明的冲突,死刑存废的地区性分析:亚洲/欧洲/美洲/非洲,从区域一体化看死刑废除:以欧盟为例)27.罚金刑在中国刑法中的地位与完善28.社区矫正在中国29.论赦免30.交通肇事罪的几个理论问题探讨(交通肇事罪中“因逃逸致人死亡”的解释与适用,从日本刑法上的保护责任者遗弃罪看我国交通肇事罪的完善)31.试论中国刑法中关于走私罪的体系建构(论走私罪普通法条与特殊法条的关系)32.试评刑法修正案(六)中关于洗钱罪的规定——兼论洗钱犯罪的完善33.试论中国刑法中金融罪的立法缺陷及完善建议(论罪中的“财物/欺/陷入错误/处分财产”要件,论金融罪与罪的关系,论贷款罪与贷款纠纷的区别,论机器的刑法适用)34.试论知识产权犯罪的法律完善(从TRIPs规定看我国知识产权罪的立法完善/司法适用)35.刑事政策视野中的“安乐死”(论刑法中“生命”的界定,论协助自杀的刑事责任)36.强奸罪的理论与立法比较(论强奸罪的主体,论强奸罪的对象,论强奸罪的行为构成,论强奸罪的“强迫”要件,论强奸罪与猥亵妇女罪的区别,论对儿童性侵害的刑法规制)37.试论转化型抢劫犯38.论侵占罪(论侵占罪与盗窃罪的区别,论侵占罪规定中的“遗忘物”,论侵占罪的“拒不退还”要件)39.关于黑社会性质组织犯罪之立法体系的完善(论黑社会性质组织的概念和认定,论黑社会性质组织与普通犯罪集团的区别)40.论医疗事故的刑事立法41.试论公害犯罪的构成要件42.从《联合国反腐败公约》看我国贪污罪的立法完善/司法适用43.关于构建中国刑法中的贿赂犯罪制裁体系探析

1、食品安全犯罪的行政刑法责任--以三鹿奶粉事件为例2、重刑化的弊端与我国刑罚模式的选择3、罪责的社会化与规范责任论的重构--期待可能性理论命运之反思4、共同过失犯罪应成立共同犯罪5、从食品安全法实施中看刑事责任的完善6、论应权利人同意之行为--被害人同意理论的重构7、反思与重构:犯罪客体新论8、罪刑法定视野下的侵犯商业秘密罪9、论罪责刑相适应原则10、竞技体育暴力行为的刑法解读11、“诉讼”定性研究--以我国民事诉讼法为视角12、论刑事和解制度在中国的构建--刑事一体化的分析进路13、《刑法》与《治安管理处罚法》的协调研究14、加强行政法与刑法交叉领域研究的必要性15、环境犯罪的刑法现状及其改进以上刑罚论文选题由学术堂整理提供

相关百科
热门百科
首页
发表服务