法学论文英文版怎么写的高一点啊

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre， namely， refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law， whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by， or what is wrong， is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime， the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty， (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime， the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent， (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors， misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre， only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment， and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there， so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually （1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence， whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak， just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle， namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition， not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2）Should know the reason， according to two: moral responsibility theory， personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct， is considered to be objective 3）That said， the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately， at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland， the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known， the law itself is not damaged， the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime， illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore， our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence， which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness， with a social moral evaluation colour， easier for people to grasp and Therefore， the author thinks that， in general， the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society， and has already With intentionally But in fact， the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent， in other words， know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal， but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness， both are Therefore， it is generally thought that the law is no excuse， the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle， but can be culpable for deliberately （2） Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame， for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent， lack of this should blame or condemning sexual， from the fundamental measure， blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society， the legal category SAN marino， legal entry in different fields and different levels of books， recognized， comprehend legal apparently endless and same， so the person of law and misunderstandings， not Now， both in theory and practice， the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore， to a certain extent， can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition， it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations， especially after a circumstance， should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor， constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view， with the attitude of this understanding， of course， that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may， FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake， is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles， generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors， whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist， or for criminal object and actually does not exist， or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake， but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree， and in the nature of law is not Therefore， the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin， crime accomplishment， and may even attempted to influence the For example， in view of the circumstances， not a thought before the enemy， and a party came to stick， afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people"， and the actual wounded is "cow"， do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items， Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors， see， is a kind of mistake， From the objective， because the mistake crime to no avail， where the criminal attempted 1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake， including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include， is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects， namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here， the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects， namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object， but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve， killing b shall be killed as b and c， do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c)， belong to an intentional crime (b) "death"， for the excess result， according to the results， which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately， to the death of the fault is propylene， identified as negligence， according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind， not applicable rules of the 2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first， the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature， such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin， and may also affect Second， the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods)， which affects not correct understanding of harm results， behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded， also can affect crime or belongs to the incident， a typical for murder on hazardous substances， because the drug failure and failed to kill people， can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour， second coming together， hence shot to play， but can't hit by the party Look， this is from the phenomenon of an object， or the final results for the mistake， but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin， can think recognize is accurate， errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation， "said"， its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent， namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b， death is the indirect intentional， just for a to b is attempted， Additionally， if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences， the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake， is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first， not some harm result， as has happened This generally constitute a Second， has certain harm result， but not for actor or for his behavior is caused， and does not affect crime Third， really happened， the offender is aware of its behavior， but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake， general to punish crime In theory， the offender is not only a crime， but continuous movement， this several continuous action is not a few crime， but a In this sense， doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime， criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake，（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime， that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding， only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong， the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes， it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant， as this mistake to hit each other， the shooting head caused the death of heart， without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error， error occurs when the purpose， but whether to intentionally resistance， reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition， natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime， and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error， conviction according to Based on this， the author thinks that， at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error， but the problem is in the law， criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes)， or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content， to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong， is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity， administrative rules and regulations， JinYuOu， disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public， and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined， and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases， the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge， and not to the behavior of social harmfulness， so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society， and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime， the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution， in addition， prosecution without proof the defendant not normal， but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal， it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus， the author， on legal irrtumslehre processing， can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known， unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above， or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit， said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the

关于英国法学论文的写作方法，具体如下：一、法学论文概述学术论文，也称学术理论文章。它是指在自然科学或社会科学领域内用来进行科学研究和描述科学研究成果的论文。法学学术论文，是指在法学领域中对某个学术理论问题进行专门的系统的科学研究，并且表述某些研究成果的论文。(一)法学学术论文，一般说来应当具有如下几个特点：学术性，即指论文对法学学术理论问题具有科学的论证性;理论性，即指论文运用充分占有的材料，经过严密论证将法学中某个或某几个问题“升华”到理论高度，从而找出带规律性的东西的思辩性。创造性，即指论文论述的法学问题“发前人所未发”，探求法学中前人没有发现的规律或匡正通说的独创性。专业性，即指法学论文对法学学科中的某个或某几个专门问题进行研究，并取得一定成果，具有供法学专家、教授、学者研讨和交流的专业性。(二)法学学术论文的主要要求是：所研究和论述的法学问题，观点正确，对社会主义革命和法制建设有促进作用;能推动法学领域学术理论的研究向前发展;具有学术论文的诸特点;全文观点与材料统一，层次分明，条理清楚;论证中逻辑严密，推理正确;所用的法学语言准确、概括、精炼;文风庄重，就事论理，据理立说，以理创新。二、法学论文选题能确定研究方向。法学研究发展很快，门类繁多;法学中待研究的题目也不少。选定了某个题目，就确定了法学研究的方向和主攻目标。方向定得准，目标愈集中，写出来的法学学术论文成功的可能性就愈大。能促进构思活动。法学学术论文写作是一种精神劳动。法学学术论文的写作是为获得法学研究成果而进行劳动的体现。它需要自己围绕学术论文的题目进行深思熟虑的和绞尽脑汁的构思和论证。选定一个好的法学论文题目，就能促进上述构思活动的深入顺利开展。

ssci论文没有，武大核心期刊的论文还是有的，你可以去看看汉斯出版社官网上的文献哈，都是开放获取的

法律论文英文版怎么写的高一点

The subject is: a blatant crime on the criminal law of the theoretical knowledgeAbstract: a flagrant crime as a general social phenomenon， has been in existence for thousands of years of social history; including， in particular the concept of school as a flagrant crime committed， it can be said with the general sense of the crime have simultaneously; the concept of criminal law as a flagrant offenders has also been historically exist in human society a thousand Openly committed as a criminal and the negative cultural expressions， whether it is the specificity of the Criminal Code norms on moral values or the reverse， and are worthy of criminal law theory researchers to explore in However， for a long time， China's Criminal Law on the "objective elements constitute a crime，" the study focus， multi-objective aspects of running an essential element， that is against the act， against the findings and results of behavior and the causal relationship between on; for the crime as an objective choice of the implementation of elements of the crime the way， but rarely get In this paper， exploring a flagrant crime， not only confined to the study of criminal law perspective， but also learn from the crime， ethics， sociology， such as the perspective of the norms of a flagrant offense， the nature of black social evil， the negative value and its comprehensive evaluation Author through so many levels， multi-angle discussion to a more deepening and comprehensive three-dimensional interpretation that the truth will be openly committed to maximize the show in the face of social and readers， so expect it to for the development of China's Criminal Jurisprudence criminal applications of the research on the subject domain， to make its own modest Key words: flagrant flagrant crime

题目：With regard to criminal law theory in the understanding of a flagrant crime正文：Flagrant crime as a general social phenomenon， has been in existence for thousands of years of social history; including， in particular the concept of school as a flagrant crime committed， it can be said with the general sense of the crime have simultaneously; the concept of criminal law as a flagrant offense， has historically existed in thousands of human Openly committed as a criminal and the negative cultural expressions， whether it is the specificity of the Criminal Code norms on moral values or the reverse， and are worthy of criminal law theory researchers to explore in However， for a long time， China's Criminal Law刑法理论界on the "objective elements constitute a crime，" the study focus， multi-objective aspects of running an essential element， that is against the act， against the findings and results of behavior and the causal relationship between on; for the crime as an objective choice of the implementation of elements of the crime the way， but rarely get In this paper， exploring a flagrant crime， not only confined to the study of criminal law perspective， but also learn from the crime， ethics， sociology， such as the perspective of the norms of a flagrant offense， the nature of black social evil， the negative value and its comprehensive evaluation Author惟愿through so many levels， multi-angle discussion to a more deepening and comprehensive three-dimensional interpretation that the truth will be openly committed to maximize the show in the face of social and readers， so expect it to for the development of China's Criminal Jurisprudence criminal applications of the research on the subject domain， to make its own modest 摘要的英文是:Abstract关键词是：Key words内容是：Flagrant；Flagrant crime

The emergence of the institution of compensation for mental injury indicates the development of social civilization development has reached a new With the development of society， the increasingly rich material life， people pay more attention to the spirit realm of life， civil main body their personal rights are infringed upon by requiring the infringer remedies by property compensation civil legal system has been the world wide approval， at present our country's spiritual damage compensation system is still exists serious defects， based on the concept of the institution of compensation for mental injury， scope and some legal provisions in China was analyzed， institution of compensation for mental injury problems and to perfect the institution of compensation for mental injury provide constructability Suggestions， making it a better protection of the legal rights of the Keywords: Spiritual damage compensation Legislative defects perfect State compensation

法学论文英文版怎么写的好一点

学术论文英文版怎么写的高一点

一、论点明确一篇好的文章应该有一个好的开始，学术类论文也是一样。所谓好的开始不仅是要对论题涉及的学术领域有一个宏观的概括和理解，更重要的是要点明确，整篇论文的重点和论点突出。“论”是一篇论文最重要的一个方面。 Thesis Statement(论点陈述)一定要交代清楚整篇文章的Structure(结构)和Purpose(目的)。比如，这篇文章用到了哪些理论知识，将会对哪些理论作出批判等等。这样，就会给看论文的老师一个很鲜明的整体印象，了解你整篇文章的目的和价值。二、理论支持和批判缺一不可虽然说论文是个人对某一领域研究的最后报告，应该全部是个人的理解和看法，但是全无理论支持的分析，天马行空的随意阐述是绝对不行的。因为我们还没有到达一个可以自己做调查研究的阶段。相反，大篇的理论陈述，毫无个人分析的论文也同样得不到高分，就算对理论的理解和描述没有任何错误，也只能算是靠书本累砌的平平之作。所以，学术论文的写作一定要既有理论支持又有个人批判，两个方面缺一不可。三、举例论证作为海外留学生，语言永远是一个很难攻克的堡垒，这点在写作上尤为明显。如何才能弱化这个劣势呢？最好的方法就是在论述时巧举例子。鲜明准确的举例说明会令枯燥的阐述变得生动，也能体现你对理论的理解和运用，可以使文章增色不少。四、合理安排时间作为学生，每个人都有过赶作业的经历。如果掌握了学习方法，在短时间内“赶”出一篇相对来说比较好的论文也不是没有可能，但这种做法是绝对不提倡的。由于英语不是我们的母语，所以在写论文的时候我们是需要时间反复检查语法，拼写和用词，检查语言是否流畅，表达是否清楚，是否运用学术语言也是平分的标准。如果一篇条理清楚，论点鲜明的论文因为语法而丢分是很可惜的。另外，如果有时间，还可以在段与段之间加一个过渡段，承上启下，这样会令整篇文章更加连贯，更有逻辑性。对于每一个学生来说，考试，写论文都是家常便饭，但很多人都把这些“指定动作”当作是个“苦差事”，一提就头疼。其实写论文也并不只是啃书本这么枯燥，倘若真要在写作时遇到了瓶颈，“憋”不出来了，可以暂时把论文放一放，看看电影、听听音乐、逛逛街，都可以看作是对写论文有帮助的活动。如果真是遇到了什么想不通的问题，不妨和老师朋友多聊一聊，其他人的建议也会提供灵感。

要简单明了的陈诉整篇论文的重点，就好像是整篇论文的 “地图”，你要让你的读者有一个概括但清晰的概念知道你的论文都要写些什么还有尽量避免用“应该”，“或许”，之类的话还有避免用第一人称 “我相信”，“我感觉”，之类的。总之要给读者留下深刻的印象

据学术堂的了解，论文对于硕士，尤其博士，是必须的一种技能，也是一道难关。所谓大道无形，小道可走。下面给出一些提升论文写作能力的心得，希望能有所裨益。论文可以有三个境界：毕业、科研、贡献。　　现在只说第一个，为了毕业。　　这里的论文，可以指EI论文、SCI/E论文。　　我把论文分成三个阶段：读、写、改。　　一、读　　即：读哪些论文（对象），读论文的目的是什么（目标），怎么读（方法）　　1、读什么论文　　读论文，需要读经典的专业基础论文、survey（概述）论文，及5-10篇左右读新的高质量的专业论文。　　好的论文怎么找？首先找专业领域中好的会议、期刊；其次，经常访问专业领域有名的实验室、研究员的主页，关注其发表的论文方向及内容；50-100篇，半年；就可以开始动手写论文了。　　2、读论文的目的　　读论文的目的有两个主要目的：　　一是了解世界上本专业领域的内容和发展情况；　　二是在了解过程中，产生自己的idea，进入这个领域。　　什么是idea？怎么样产生？idea一般是在读论文的过程中产生的，给出三种比较简单产生idea的方法。　　（1）第一种弥补缺陷法。即去发现别人论文中的weakness（缺陷）。你在读很多个论文时候，就会逐渐发现，每一篇论文都不是完美的，解决的都是某一方面的问题。很多论文，尤其是经典论，都有很多论文跟着去提高和改善原来论文的效率、方法什么的。因此，你可以根据这个特点，去找你感兴趣的论文的weakness，你提出相应的弥补缺陷的解决方案；　　（2）第二种新型方案法。就是提出与论文不同的解决方案，你觉得你在性能、方法、效益等方面有新的方法，那就产生了新的idea，不断地磨合，修正，完善你的idea，就慢慢成为一篇比较好的论文；　　（3）第三种减少约束法。即减少论文中的assumption（假设），一般来说，所有的假设都是约束条件，去除约束条件就是形成新的方法的过程。　　这三种方法是比较简单的、操作性比较强的方法，比较有针对性的产生idea，避免看论文中的茫然状态。值得注意的是，在产生idea过程中，不要想着憋大的idea，不要试图完全推翻或者建立自己的体系。在目前阶段，对大多数人来说，这是不可能的。好高骛远，往往会半途而废。你有一点点的贡献就好。没有一篇论文是完美的，而任何人的工作都必须在其他人工作基础上进行的。　　3、怎么读论文　　（1）首先，最忌讳的是一篇论文反复读前面的几段。要读，尽量一次性读完，不管理解多少，尽量一次读完，你可以一篇论文多读几遍。不要放。很多人都是，觉得读起来难，读一读，放一放，然后再从头读。好像烧开水，没等开锅呢，就凉凉了，然后再烧。　　（2）第二，读的时候带着想法读。读论文不是相面，你要看看内容是什么，和以前的有没有区别，有什么不同，有没有weakness。但是在阅读的过程中，往往就忘了这个事情。怎么办呢，就是每次看完，对这篇论文做个总结，总结一下论文的主要阐述的内容和方法，和以前的对比一下，这样，就把论文吃透了。好的论文不妨隔三差五的多读几次。　　（3）第三，看到好的句子，记下来，然后自己写论文时候改一下就可以用的。尤其是读native的论文，非常必要。论文的文风怎么样，整个文章的版式，句子的书写，词汇的使用。论文读多了，就很容易把专业词汇积累下来，所以，尤其在开始的时候，一定要把好的句子、单词记下来。好记性不如烂笔头，非常推荐大家这样去做。　　二、写　　写论文和读论文过程类似，包括确定论文的性质，论文的目标（发表到哪里），写论文的方法。要了解论文的组成是什么，每一部分应该怎么写，然后再进入写论文的过程。　　在具体写作的时候，需要考虑下面的过程：　　写什么性质的论文。如会议论文、期刊论文、letter、regular paper，或者写的是综述（survey）、方法、理论等等。不同的论文的对象，载体，篇幅，侧重点是不一样的。比如，会议论文、短论文等对新的要求比较高，比较短，其他的次之，所以论文写作要集中在新的方面；而期刊论文等对新的要求之外，还要求完善、高质量，所以写作时候要系统性和创新性并重。　　写论文的目的是什么。第一，你想要发表的地方是什么，会议还是期刊。不同的地方有不同的要求，尤其是期刊论文。所以，在写论文之前，尽量确定要投的期刊或会议。然后，去阅读几篇最新的该期刊或者会议的论文，明确一下体例和内容大致规划。重要的是，你选择的题目和投稿对象的要求尽量切合。第二，你想要发表的时间，一定要有个发表的时间点。一方面，人都是有惰性的，你限制了时间点，就能很好的督促你，你可以多选择几个，这样你就会处于忙碌和兴奋状态，成果就会快而且好，否则非常容易消极怠工。另一方面，很多毕业生，需要在写大论文之前，需要得到论文的接收函。在时间规划上也是有要求的。如果想在时间上快一些，可以找一下相关刊物的special issue或者special section等，一般这特刊，出版的速度相对快些。一定要提前谋划，无论是会议还是期刊，一般要提前半年以上。　　写论文的方法。首先了解一下论文的结构。通常一篇论文包括7个大的部分，每页大概10段，每段大概4，5个句子。所以，一篇会议论文大概200-300个句子罢了。一小时写5句，一天写一页也就差不多了，一周也就写一篇论文吧，当然前提是idea什么都比较成熟后。其实，如果真的想明白了，差不多2-3天也就可以了。　　论文的组成。下面，针对论文给出7个大部分的一些内容组成：　　（1） Abstract—— 对自己工作及其贡献的总结：a）阐述问题；b）说明自己的解决方案和结果。（150-200words）　　（2）Introduction——背景，以及文章的大纲、你的贡献：a）题X是重要的；b）前人的工作A、B曾经研究过这个问题；c）A、B有一些缺陷；d）我们提出了方法D；e）D的基本特征，和A、B进行比较；f）实验证明D比A、B优越；g）文章的基本结构，大纲。（1page）　　（3）Previous Work——说明自己与前人的不同：a）将历史上前人的工作分成类别；b）对每项重要的历史工作进行简短的回顾(一到几句)，注意要回顾正确，抓住要点，避免歧义；c）和自己提出的工作进行比较；d）不要忽略前人的重要工作，要公正评价前人的工作，不要过于苛刻；e）强调自己的工作和前人工作的不同，最好举出各自适用例子。　　（4）Our Solution——描述自己的工作，可分成多个部分：a）从读者角度阐明定义和表示法；b）提供算法的伪码，图解和相应解释；c）用设问的方式回答读者可能提出的潜在问题；d）复杂的冗长的证明和细节可以放在附录中，这里关键是把问题阐述清楚；e）特例和例外应该在脚注中给予说明。　　（5） Performance Analysis——验证提出的方法和思路：a）合理地设计实验（简洁的实验和详尽的实验步骤）；b）必要的比较，突出科学性；c）讨论，说明结果的意义；d）给出结论。　　（6） Conclusion——总结、前景及结文：a）快速简短的总结；b）未来工作的展望；c）结束全文。　　（7） References——对相关重要背景文献的全面引用：a）选择引文（众所周知的结论不必引用，其他人的工作要引用，经典的和新的论文要引用）；b）与前文保持一致。　　然后我们就开始写论文了。　　首先，写论文时候，最好一气呵成。千万不要犹豫，今天写点，明天写点的样子。那样往往写不好论文。一篇SCI论文，我想，一般最多用一周多一点的时间写完主题部分；而一般会议论文2，3天即可。当然，一些实验可能需要时间长些。无论如何，不可以拖延。可以说，每篇论文都可以发表，所以你写出的论文肯定是有成果的。　　其次，写论文时候，有些需要注意的语言表述的地方。首先，尽量拼写、语法正确。保证全文没有单词错误和明显的语法错误，这个非常重要。论文学术是非常严谨的，错误拼写容易让人觉得水平不高。另外，写作句子尽量简单，每个句子只包含一个意思，这个和中文论文差别很大。记住一定用简单的句子，一般情况下，即使算上从句也尽量不要超过两句话。第三，避免用口语。例如so、the same as、one hand…on the other hand等等。从native和好的论文里面，把重要的连词的应用学好。如therefore，however，moreover等等，尽量装着学术化一些。第四，尽量避免第一人称，we怎么怎么地。　　论文的组成元素。通常，包括图形、公式、算法、证明等等。论文应该是图文并茂的。通常情况下，如果读者是同一领域的研究人员，他们看完论文的图片及图注就可以知道这篇文章大体所做的工作。因此，要标注好每一幅图片所展示的信息，但尽量简洁。图和文本要保持一致，并且互为补充，所有图在论文中都是必须提及的。不同的图有不同的要求：　　（1）对于说明性、功能性和流程性等的图，我建议一般先自己在纸上手绘大框，这样方便设计、修改，等定型后，在用专业工具绘画，这样一般效果很好而且节省时间。　　（2）另外，当采用柱状图、折线图等，优先用黑白色，然后是灰色或阴影的，最后才是彩色的。据说有大概10%的男性是红/绿色盲，因此要避免使用红/绿色，而且打印时候大多时候是黑白的，所以，在采用颜色标识的同时，尽量加一些标识性的线条标志，要有区别于其他区域的大小和形状。对于这些性能分析、对比等，在解释时候一定要尽量说明图的形成原因，并包括数据。如与谁相比，能效提高百分之多少，什么原因造成的等等　　（3）第三，作图工具一定要专业，尽量避免用excel等做，通常做的不是很好看。图的质量一般是300dpi以上，所以如果可能，尽量用专业工具作图，然后粘贴。在论文录取后，尤其期刊论文，一般需要提交高质量的图片，尽量是jpg和tif格式的。　　（4）最后，论文排版要尽量和论文要求一致，直接使用投稿对象的模板。如果latex等熟悉的朋友，尽量用latex，排版的质量非常棒的。　　除了图，论文里面还应该有公式、算法、证明、定义等。一定尽量用专业的东西编写，这些地方尽量不要用图片。整篇论文要尽量用多种元素说明，避免整篇大片大片的文字描述。　　最后，好的论文要有好的明确的题目，我一般是先写一个然后整篇论文写好后，查重、修改、定稿。查重目的主要是了解下重复率是多少，避免不必要的麻烦，其次还有助于论文的修改。　　三、改　　好的论文不是写出来的，是改出来的。完成一篇论文后，先通读一下，看看有没有什么要更改的。一般来说，更改有本人更改和他人更改两种。写完之后通读一次，先不要再读，放两三天再说。这样容易产生新的更好的想法，然后再仔细更改。更改是个打磨的过程，必须字斟句酌，可以参考其他好的文章，对照写。改论文绝对不是查缺补漏那么简单，要从审稿人、读者多个角度去看，想想读者能从你这个论文里面获得多少、想看的是什么。另外，一定请领域朋友帮助审查一下，以便检验论文的正确性和新鲜性，而且可以对一些术语用词进行改善。　　改好之后，就是投稿。　　一定要选择和自己论文非常搭的期刊或者会议投稿。如果是正常期刊的论文，一般随时都可以投稿。但是对于特刊、会议一般是有时间限制的。对有时间限制的，建议尽量提前一两天投稿。我见过很多人，都是非得到最后那天才投稿，这样如果发生意外就不好补救了。另外，有些期刊为了增加公正性，要求匿名投稿，这个一定要注意。　　最后，不管论文接受还是被拒，都会有比较好的意见回来，一定要认真阅读这些意见并做相应的修改及反馈。　　一些需要注意的地方　　（1）论文的滚动问题。一个方向，发表一篇论文后，不是就完成大吉了。还有尽量深挖你这个课题。一个主题多种实现方法。一个好的idea，我觉得怎么应该发一到两篇conference和一个journal　　（2）论文合作：在质量和数量上大幅提高。　　（3）作者排序的问题，为以后工作做准备。　　（4）项目申请问题。　　（5）最低满足论文之后，是为以后铺路的问题。平实心态，积极争取。

英文版学术论文怎么写的高一点

把握你要写的主题，紧扣主题，导出关键词；花大量时间，阅读相关读书资料，摘相关内容；开头可引用公司简介、主题内容等适合你的文章风格的；找相关论文，通过期刊网去下载论文作为参考；一个好的论文就是把别人的精髓都引用过来，然后切合到自己的实践事例中，往往这样的论文是大家通俗易懂，更容易接受的。

学术堂告诉你，一般第一次写英文论文时会比较麻烦，但只要熟悉英文论文的写作流程后，后面就比较快了。第一步，大量阅读英文学术论文质变引起量变。当时，一个博士师兄给了我一篇Nature论文。我十分感兴趣，读完这篇之后一口气顺藤摸瓜读了很多相关文章。一个月内，我每天打印两到三篇文章带在身上以便去自习时仔细研读，并做好笔记。一个月下来，几十页的笔记积淀下来。于是，当我产生想法把这写成一篇论文的时候，原材料就有了。第二步，大概框架搭建（金字塔原理）先把论文的骨架搭建起来，而不是想到哪儿写到哪儿。当时我有了几十页的笔记，虽然都是有用的信息，但是杂乱无章。于是我尝试运用金字塔原理（金字塔原理 (豆瓣)。金字塔原理是由明托大师发明的一种思维写作方式。其中心思想如下：每一层次的思想观点必须是低一层次思想的概括每一组的思想观点必须在逻辑上属于同一范畴每一组思想观点必须符合逻辑顺序遵照这一思想，我先确定我论文的主题。然后寻找几个支持主题的论点，再在论点下提供分论点。后来PhD的Academic Writing课程上称之为Bullet Points。第三步，填充数据文献，资料将各种资料填充入分论点部分。很多时候我会从别人的文章直接copy段落，以后再做修改以避免抄袭嫌疑（此时记下文献来源）。这步之后，你的文章毛坯子已经有了。第四步，理顺段落关系，语句修改也就是承上启下的句子。大致就是些口水话。推荐的方法就是从别人的文章里摘抄漂亮实用的句式和词语。这部分需要长期的文献阅读和留心积累。本科时，老师经常给我讲我们学校某院士年轻时经常把别人论文里的句式抄成小字条，随身带着，不时翻看，等到他写文章时，先用中文写好，翻译成英文时，直接套进那些记下的固定句式里。PS: 为了避免抄袭，paraphrase之后请记得写好reference。举一些语句方面的例子吧。少用主动语态，多用被动语态。同一段落时态注意一致，多为过去时。一个句子不要以阿拉伯数字开头。不管你是几个人，最好用we，而不是I 句子与句子之间，多用连接词承前启后（however， therefore， additionally， moreover， furthermore，）用一些高级词汇。important太不大气了，significant稍微好点，高手都用essential，pivotal。能用due to，就别用because之类的。widely used 就不如ubiquitously used帅气。About/around跟approximately比起来也相形见绌。当然词汇不是越高级越好，注意上下文的语境，合适最重要。