关于法律的政治论文题目大全高中

学术堂整理了十五个好写的法律论文题目供大家进行参考:　　论人工智能生成物的著作权保护　　网络游戏直播的著作权问题研究--以耀宇诉斗鱼案为例　　体育赛事直播节目的版权问题探析--以新浪网诉凤凰网中超体育赛事直播案为例　　同人作品的著作权问题研究--以金庸诉江南《此间的少年》侵权案为例　　论我国著作权法定许可制度的完善　　著作权延伸性集体管理制度研究　　图形用户界面(GUI)外观设计专利保护研究--兼评奇虎诉江民案　　我国引入局部外观设计专利制度的思考　　专利当然许可制度研究　　中国好声音商标侵权案评析　　王老吉加多宝知名商品特有包装装潢纠纷案评析　　我国声音商标的法律保护探析--以腾讯声音商标案为视角　　网络环境中不正当竞争行为的法律规制　　实用艺术品的知识产权保护　　知识产权与民法典的关系探讨

多选题：ABCD（依次递进的关系）简答：1、严重的社会危害性刑事违法性。受刑法处罚性。 2、罪行法定原则罪行相适应原则法律面前人人平等原则 3、平等原则自愿原则公平原则诚实信用原则禁止权利滥用原则 4、a、正当防卫的起因条件：是指存在具有社会危害性和侵害紧迫性的不法侵害行为。 b、正当防卫的时间条件：是指正当防卫只能在不法侵害正在进行之时实行，不能实行提前防卫和事后防卫； c、正当防卫的对象条件：是指正当防卫只能针对不法侵害者本人实行，不能及于第三者； d、正当防卫的主观条件：是指正当防卫人主观上必须出于正当防卫的目的，即是为了保护国家、公共利益、本人或者他人的人身、财产和其他权利免受不法侵害。如果不是出于上述目的，则不能成立正当防卫； e、正当防卫的限度条件：是指正当防卫不能明显超过必要的限度且造成重大损害。是否明显超过必要限度并造成重大损害，是区别防卫的合法与非法、正当与过当的一个标志论述题： 1、本质——首先，反映工人阶级的意志；其次，集中体现了工人阶级的根本利益。人民民主专政的基础是工人阶级和农民阶级的联盟。也反映了拥护祖国统一的爱国者要求祖国统一的愿望。我国社会主义法律是工人阶级和广大人民意志的表现。只有在自己的先锋队的领导下，用社会主义思想武装起来，才能形成统一的有组织的力量，并使自己的意志正确反映社会发展的客观要求。 2、从法律体系看，国家只有一部宪法，只有一个中央国家机关体系（包括立法机关、行政机关和司法机关）；每个公民只有一个统一的国籍；各行政区域单位或自治单位均受中央政府的统一领导，不能脱离中央而独立；各行政区域单位或自治单位所拥有的权力都是由中央通常以法律的形式授予的；国家整体是代表国家进行交往的唯一主体。

学术堂整理了一部分新颖的法律论文题目，供大家进行参考：1、完善我国合宪性审查制度的思考2、地方人大保证宪法实施职能研究3、合宪性审查制度研究4、人大监督权与宪法实施研究5、我国宪法实施路径与方法研究6、论宪法解释的功能7、论大数据时代公民隐私权保护8、我国检察机关提起公益诉讼问题研究9、监察体制改革背景下检察机关的定位与职能调整研究10、设区市地方立法权问题研究11、论我国行政诉讼确认判决的定位12、论公务员的廉洁义务13、论教师基本权利的法律保护14、行政诉讼跨区管辖改革研究15、社区矫正的现、问题与对策--以六安市某县（区）为例16、公共服务外包法律规制

你要是实在不知道怎么定题目的话，你可以找（法学）里去找找头绪

关于法律的政治论文题目大全高中英语

通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。

法律伴我成长老师们、同学们：大家好！随着改革开放地深入发展，信息革命地日新月异，我国社会体制也正进一步地完善，但同时不可避免地受到国外颓废文化思想的侵蚀，加上一些不负责的传媒和商业影片过分渲染暴力、色情等不良信息，国内拜金主义、读书无用论及封建迷信思想的影响，导致社会出现了人生价值的多元化选择。特别是我们青少年正处于人生观、价值观尚未完全确立、并且易变时期，对社会当前存在的不良因素及诱惑难于辨别而且缺乏足够的自觉抵抗力，因而对人生感到迷茫和困惑，人生价值取向失衡，思想产生偏激和叛逆，出现厌学、逃学、整天沉浸在游戏机厅、网吧里，甚至在与社会正轨相背驰的道路上越走越远、越陷越深，最终不能自拔，走上违法犯罪的道路。青少年时期是一个人成长的关键时刻，辨别是非能力薄弱，有强烈的好奇心，另外青少年模仿能力很强，易受到外界的影响。有这样的一个少年犯张XX，16岁，是看了很多港台警匪战片和武侠小说，对其中“老大”的任务和打打杀杀的场面很羡慕，总想着几个人组成团伙，占领一条街，称王称霸，一次竟在光天化日之下拦路抢劫，结果被判4年学习法律知识是善于运用法律武器保护自己的合法权益，敢于同违法犯罪行为做斗争的需要。有些青少年由于不懂得法律，当自己的合法权益受到伤害的时候，不能运用法律武器来维护自己的合法权益，而是用“私了”，或者采用违法犯罪的手段来维护自己的权益例如，有的人一辆自行车被人拦路抢走了，这个人不去向公安机关报案，而是叫上了几个朋友去向坏人索要，并将对方打伤致残，结果这个青少年倒犯了故意伤害罪。此外，学习法律知识也是强化社会主义道德意识，提高道德修养，促进自己健康成长的需要。道德是人们关于善与恶、美与丑、正义与邪恶、公正与偏私、光荣与耻辱、诚实与虚伪等观点，以及与此相适应的行为规则的总和。道德和法律是相互作用、相互影响、相互渗透、相互补充的两类社会规范，都是调整人们行为的规则和尺度，也是广大青少年必备的基本要素。我国法律的实施一方面要靠国家的强制力，另一方面也要靠人民群众的自觉遵守。自觉遵守宪法和法律是每个公民的基本义务，也是做一个有理想、有道德、有文化、有纪律的好公民的起码条件，每一个公民都要自觉遵守宪法和法律。要遵守宪法，首先要学习法律，了解法律，提高法律意识，增强法制观念；不懂得法律，没有法律意识和法制观念，不但不能自觉地遵守法律，而且还会做出违反法律甚至违法犯罪的事情来。由于我国青少年违法犯罪的人数急剧增加，其中一个重要的原因就是许多青少年不懂得法律。例如有的青少年交朋友、谈恋爱，当对方不愿意并提出中断恋爱关系时，他就不择手段地威吓甚至用暴力来伤害对方，这明明是违法犯罪的行为，他反而认为是在谈恋爱。这些例子是由于他们不懂得法律而走上犯罪道路的。因此，所有的青少年学生应该自觉提高自身综合素质，提高政治思想觉悟，提高明辨是非的能力，增强法制观念和法律意识，从身边发生的违纪行为导致处分、或一些因违法导致铁窗生涯而悔恨终身的案例中吸取教训。青少年应坚定崇尚科学、追求真知的信念；树立远大理想，确立人生的奋斗目标，牢固树立正确的世界观、人生观和价值观；勤学苦练，认真学习科学文化知识，用党的方针路线指引自己，用优秀思想文化影响自己，激励自己；认真学习法律知识努力提高知法、用法、守法和护法的水平，让法律一直随着我们成长。

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre， namely， refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law， whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by， or what is wrong， is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime， the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty， (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime， the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent， (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors， misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre， only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment， and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there， so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually （1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence， whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak， just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle， namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition， not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2）Should know the reason， according to two: moral responsibility theory， personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct， is considered to be objective 3）That said， the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately， at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland， the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known， the law itself is not damaged， the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime， illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore， our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence， which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness， with a social moral evaluation colour， easier for people to grasp and Therefore， the author thinks that， in general， the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society， and has already With intentionally But in fact， the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent， in other words， know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal， but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness， both are Therefore， it is generally thought that the law is no excuse， the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle， but can be culpable for deliberately （2） Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame， for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent， lack of this should blame or condemning sexual， from the fundamental measure， blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society， the legal category SAN marino， legal entry in different fields and different levels of books， recognized， comprehend legal apparently endless and same， so the person of law and misunderstandings， not Now， both in theory and practice， the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore， to a certain extent， can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition， it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations， especially after a circumstance， should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor， constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view， with the attitude of this understanding， of course， that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may， FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake， is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles， generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors， whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist， or for criminal object and actually does not exist， or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake， but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree， and in the nature of law is not Therefore， the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin， crime accomplishment， and may even attempted to influence the For example， in view of the circumstances， not a thought before the enemy， and a party came to stick， afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people"， and the actual wounded is "cow"， do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items， Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors， see， is a kind of mistake， From the objective， because the mistake crime to no avail， where the criminal attempted 1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake， including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include， is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects， namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here， the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects， namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object， but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve， killing b shall be killed as b and c， do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c)， belong to an intentional crime (b) "death"， for the excess result， according to the results， which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately， to the death of the fault is propylene， identified as negligence， according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind， not applicable rules of the 2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first， the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature， such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin， and may also affect Second， the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods)， which affects not correct understanding of harm results， behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded， also can affect crime or belongs to the incident， a typical for murder on hazardous substances， because the drug failure and failed to kill people， can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour， second coming together， hence shot to play， but can't hit by the party Look， this is from the phenomenon of an object， or the final results for the mistake， but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin， can think recognize is accurate， errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation， "said"， its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent， namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b， death is the indirect intentional， just for a to b is attempted， Additionally， if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences， the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake， is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first， not some harm result， as has happened This generally constitute a Second， has certain harm result， but not for actor or for his behavior is caused， and does not affect crime Third， really happened， the offender is aware of its behavior， but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake， general to punish crime In theory， the offender is not only a crime， but continuous movement， this several continuous action is not a few crime， but a In this sense， doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime， criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake，（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime， that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding， only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong， the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes， it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant， as this mistake to hit each other， the shooting head caused the death of heart， without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error， error occurs when the purpose， but whether to intentionally resistance， reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition， natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime， and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error， conviction according to Based on this， the author thinks that， at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error， but the problem is in the law， criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes)， or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content， to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong， is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity， administrative rules and regulations， JinYuOu， disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public， and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined， and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases， the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge， and not to the behavior of social harmfulness， so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society， and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime， the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution， in addition， prosecution without proof the defendant not normal， but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal， it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus， the author， on legal irrtumslehre processing， can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known， unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above， or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit， said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the

物权期待权与抵押权冲突的适用规则　　不动产买受人提起的执行异议之诉　　不动产事实物权　　让与担保的制度思考　　论流质契约的相对禁止　　商铺租赁权担保的体系定位与法律效力　　融资租赁(或售后回租)中租赁物之善意取得　　民法典编纂视角下动产担保物权对抗规则之重构　　论夫妻财产的潜在共有　　夫妻之间给予不动产约定的物权效力及救济　　夫妻财产制契约的效力与不动产物权变动　　一方擅自处分夫妻共有房产的规则适用　　(本回答来源于学术堂)

关于法律的政治论文题目大全初中

自己去看下（法学）吧，看下别人的论题是什么，你参考学习下

身边的法律生活与法法制方圆

法制与我同行法网恢恢疏而不漏立足于这个社会普法教育

1、法制在我心中　　2、法律让我茁壮成长　　3、人人遵守交通法　　4、法网恢恢疏而不漏　　5、情大？法大？　　6、做一名知法懂法守法的大学生　　7、法制伴我行　　8、知法、懂法、守法　　9、那些年，我们一起打过的官司　　10、法制教育让我成长　　题目太多了，只要是与法律、法制相关的，一般都可以。上述10个题目仅供参考。

法律相关论文题目大全高中政治

学术堂整理了一部分法律论文题目，供大家参考:　　非全日制劳动者权益保护问题研究　　论行政法比例原则的适用　　论行政事实行为　　论《英雄烈士保护法》的立法意义与完善路径　　论我国政府信息公开制度的完善　　论劳务派遣中劳动者合法权益的保障　　"当场击毙"正当化研究　　我国偷渡犯罪刑法立法研究　　我国未成年人犯罪刑法立法研究　　论刑法中的犯罪的社会危害性　　论刑法在反恐中的作用与局限　　我国环境犯罪刑法立法研究　　人体器官犯罪研究　　我国宪法指导下的刑法理念研究　　论民间文学艺术的知识产权保护　　关于未成年人犯罪及预防的思考　　邪教组织的传播与治理　　浅析网络赌博的现状与治理　　未成年人犯罪法律制度研究　　故意杀人罪在中国的死刑适用研究

法律论文题目大全高中政治

你要是实在不知道怎么定题目的话，你可以找（法学）里去找找头绪

论死刑复核权的收回（龙宗智有一篇类似的文章）

论转化犯论“携带凶器抢夺” 论“限制加重”的数罪并罚原则论危险犯的终止论结果加重犯论共同过失犯罪的存在可能性论原因自由行为论我国刑法中的定量因素论巨额财产来源不明罪之存废论社会危害性标准诉讼法检察机关在刑事诉讼中的职能定位论“以事实为根据”与证据裁判原则暴力取证罪的立法完善程序性制裁与刑讯逼供的遏制论上诉不加刑原则关于我国设立沉默权制度的思考辩诉交易制度在中国发展前景论我国取保候审制度的完善——兼与保释制度之比较论非法证据排除规则在我国的适用刑事诉讼中被害人法律保护存在的问题与对策经济法、环境法、劳动法1 论环境侵权行为的构成2 对环境权性质的思考3 论环境侵权中的精神损害赔偿4 论环境刑法的特点环境侵权民事救济制度研究我国的环境公益诉讼制度探析水污染防治法执行问题研究《环境保护法》修改若干问题的一点思考我国战略环境影响评价立法研究环境与国际贸易若干法律问题探析民商法遗失物拾得制度若干问题研究——从利益平衡与制度设计角度试论表达自由与隐私权保护的冲突与平衡论网络空间隐私权及其法律保护确立我国有限合伙制度的法律思考试论继承中债权人利益保护的法律完善农村合作经济组织法律问题研究论我国监护制度的完善论居住权公司破产制度研究论集体土地使用权制度宪法与行政法1．宪政与司法审查2．公民权与人权3．行政诉讼制度的完善4．资格罚研究5．听证制度研究6．论村民自治7．选举制度的完善8．市场经济条件下公民劳动权及其实现9．论人大对司法机关的个案监督10．当代中国的变迁与宪法发展