法学发表英文论文

法学发表英文论文

法硕通常发表英文论文。但国内的法学期刊或者社科综合期刊经济类刊物发表论文用中文即可。

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.2. The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.

一、Westlaw（法律全文数据库）Westlaw 是法律出版集团Thomson Legal and Regulator’s于1975年开发的，为国际法律专业人员提供的互联网的搜索工具。Westlaw International迅速地存取案例、法令法规、表格、条约、商业资料和更多的资源。通过布尔逻辑搜索引擎，可以检索数百万的法律文档。二、LexisNexis法律数据库其数据库内容涉及新闻、法律、政府出版物、商业信息、及社会信息等，其中法规法律方面的数据库是LEXIS-NEXIS的特色信息源，是面向大学法学院、律师、法律专业人员设计的数据库产品，内容非常全面，具有非常大的影响力，尤其在法律业界具有很高知名度。三、HeinOnline数据库是美国著名的以法律为核心，涉及政治、国际关系、外交等领域的全文数据库。现有近1700种法学期刊，675卷国际法领域权威巨著，100000多个案例，1400多部精品法学学术专著。美国所有法学院均已订购。该数据库是法学教学、研究和学习的必备资料库。四、ProQuest是一个检索平台，博硕论文英文全文，检索国外的法学学位论文。学科分类:政治法律 工商经济与管理 文学与新闻传播 语言学五、Kluwer Law Online Journals是世界三大信息出版集团之一的威科集团（Wolters Kluwer）旗下的Kluwer Law International出版社的旗舰产品，该数据库包含23种全文法律学术期刊(Journals)的全文信息，其中包含数十万篇期刊全文，涉及商法、经济法、欧共体法、国际（贸易）法、竞争法(反垄断法)、交通运输法、环境法、税法、商业仲裁等各个领域。六、SpringerLink是全球最大的在线科学、技术和医学(STM)领域学术资源平台服务范围涵盖各个研究领域，提供 12 个分学科子库,其中就有人文、社会科学和法律。七、文献党下载器（wxdown.org）,一大型文献馆，整合汇总中外文献数据库资源，专门提供文献查找下载，覆盖各个学科包括众多法律文献数据库资源，如：Westlaw、HeinOnline、LexisNexis等等。

发表英文法学论文

一、刊物选择光文章本身好不够，刊物也要选择好。刊物选择同等重要！（一）刊物选择范围1.不建议投CSSCI来源刊物第一，CSSCI来源刊物审稿周期长。此类刊物审稿周期一般为3到4个月，至少也需2个月。很多刊物不回复，只有少数的刊物没录稿还会给你回复一下。我有一次投一个刊物一个周就回复了，说是编辑初审就没过，这种打击很正常，我们要锲而不舍。也投过《学海》，一个半月就回复，回复说的是我的文章不符合他们刊物的风格。第二，发文周期长。此类刊物从文章定稿到最后刊发一般至少半年。比如，《西北人口》编辑部8月份说录用我的文章，过了半年，到了第二年刊物才出来。可能《法学研究》这种权威刊物，要等一年多。第三，大多CSSCI来源刊物不发硕、博士学生（独立作者）文章。CSSCI来源刊物中的潜在录稿规则导致学生及青年教师文章录稿空间缩小。C刊潜在的规则：知名学者约稿、学者之间相互推荐学生发文、学者之间相互在对方刊物发文、知名学者“姓名”效应等。不像国外的匿名审稿，这些潜在的录稿规则，占C刊稿件比例肯定不在少数，何况还有那么多年轻老师投稿呢。第四，部分CSSCI刊物办刊质量不高。不要以为C刊都好，中国要讲竞争，还要平衡利益。党政部门、名人效应都可能影响C刊的评选。你们注意观察，有些C刊一期七八十篇，还不如普刊。收钱的C刊的，不要发这种刊物，这让自己自我掉价。具体哪些专门收钱、质量不行的C刊我们私下交流，我这里公开讲有故意损人的嫌疑，不讲为好。2.建议多投二本院校非核心的学报这是因为这些二本学报代表学校门面和学术水平，注重办刊质量；审稿周期较短，一般为半个月到1个月以内；发文周期较短，一般2个月内就出刊；愿意录用硕、博士生较高质量的文章。3.建议多投党政院校非核心的学报官方性质，注重办刊质量；审稿周期较短（半个月到1个月以内）；发文周期较短（2个月内就出刊）；愿意录用硕、博士生较高质量的文章；转载率较高。各省地的党政系统学校学报，有145种左右，愿意用我们学生的文章。不要小看这些文章行政院校，被转载的机会很大。2010年转载量中，转载率已经很好了。有些刊物可能你们不知道，例如甘肃行政学院学报，这些的刊物的转载率很高。党政系统的学报转载率高，很注重质量，有综合指数排名，宁波市委党校学报，大家可能没听过，可以成为大家以后投稿的刊物范围。人大复印资料转载量排名前30名的党政系统学报中，转载率在10%以上的共有13种，转载数量在10篇以上的刊物共26种。转载数及转载量排名前30名的党政系统刊物中，非核心期刊占半数以上。二、刊物确定第一，详细了解备选刊物的发文主题。建议进入CNKI把备选刊物过去一年的发文目录找出来，根据目录归类了解刊物发文的主题，对比投稿文章是否与刊物以往发文主题相符合。大家要了解哪些刊物，去图书馆转一转，法学C刊有哪些，可以了解一下。刊物一年的发文目录给看一下，这个已经进行了分类，和主题进行一个对比，看是不是这个范围。如果你的文章主题编辑不熟悉，一般很难被录用。第二，地域差异对刊物主题的影响。沿海的刊物一般不会发民族、西部主题的文章。每个刊物有地域特色，比如西北地区的民族类刊物侧重发藏族的，四川民族刊物侧重彝族。第三，学科差异对刊物主题的影响。法学技术性太强的文章不好投，尽量写和相关学科沾边的文章，这样能够不局限于投法学刊物。第四，研究方法是否适应刊物风格。研究方法、数据统计也很重要，你用太专业的社会学方法、统计学的方法搞研究，投法学核心刊物可能就不合适。因为中国法学的法学研究目前还是文字到文字，属于粗放研究阶段，不像国外引入很多高度量化的研究。三、投稿方式（一）A4纸张打印原则上都用打印稿。打印出来看起来比较舒服，这是一般人的心理。电子投稿和打印邮寄任选一种的也建议用打印稿。电子投稿一般附上文章简要的题目，附上姓名，把文章的基本信息在文件里列出来，单位、摘要、姓名、基金项目，有项目比较好发，如果是同一个专业其他老师也可以挂，只要知会一下，也是做贡献。编辑都是先看题目、摘要，基本信息，大概可以知道有没可能录用你的稿。（二）大号信封邮寄。大号的信封邮寄，刚好装A4纸。邮局都有的，一般可以买几十个备着用。（三）字号和间距。宋体小四号字，行距20磅，这个字号和行距是一般人都能接受的范围。字太大或太小不行，20磅介于单倍到1.5之间。这个字体和行距虽然不是最好，但大部分能接受。编辑一般比较年轻，不存在老花眼问题。（四）排版方式应当能够参考所投刊物。四、论文录用（一）编辑通知录稿的方式1.电话通知（1）一般通过座机打。（2）投稿后的相应时间内要对未接座机号码具备一定敏感性。我投稿《湖北民族学院学报》的时候，5中旬投的，6月初端午节后回校没接到编辑部打来的电话，看到陌生电话以为是打错了。这篇文章三月份到五月份投了20个C刊，只有《学海》回复审稿意见，虽然没录用，还是安慰了我一下，其他全部没有理我。一看作者87年生的，就明白你是学生。后来我投了这个普刊，之后我想万一是编辑部打来的呢，这叫“无心插柳柳成荫”、“功夫不负有心人”。我一查是湖北的区号，就回过去，编辑说要录用我的稿件，之后就是修改了。也有人和我相反的处理方式。我院有同学投了关于民族地区宗教信仰调查的文章，投稿后一段时候后曾发现手机有未接座机号码，之后没有及时主动回复。过了段时间，他给刊物联系，结果编辑告知他本来打算录用他的文章，当时曾电话联系过，但是他没有接到电话。编辑表示，如果他本人同意，还可以发表他的文章。但是，这时已经过了中期考核的时间。一个编辑会审很多文章，具体审稿的编辑人手也不会很多，很可能一忙就会忘哪个电话没有打通。这个例子是给大家打打预防针，这是一个教训。2.邮件通知邮件的话会发一个正式的文件，附修改规范，问是否同意在本刊发文。(1)决定录用，问本人是否同意。可以一稿多投，但不可以一稿多用。很多刊物说不能一稿多投，但只是单方约定，录稿了都得给你联系，要得到作者同意。(2)大致刊用的时间、期数。（3）不同意发文可直接回复邮件。刊物定稿前，都可以撤稿。撤稿发邮件同时，最好电话联系。3、文章返修（1）参照本刊物的排版及注释规范。（2）权威刊物出具匿名审稿人意见。权威刊物或者好刊物修改的次数可能多次。文科发文章，周期比较快。我知道一个华西的博士，国外的Medline数据库刊物，从录稿到最后发文整整用了3年时间，中间修改了8次。国内中文刊物编辑改了一到两次就可以了。最后是发来文章校样让作者最后核对。Q&A问：二本学校的学报，什么时候要求投稿人支付版面费？求支付版面费的问题你怎么看呢？答：如果真的涉及到中期考核的问题，你的文章被录稿。可以给编辑谈判的，要不就撤稿。他一般会用的，即使你说不交钱。你想一下正规的二本学报或者其他党政系统学校学报为什么要你一个学生的文章呢？你有要价的资本，要有自信，肯定是你写得比一般人要好，至少有些新意。我们有博士，一家普刊说要他的文章，但说版面费的事情，他就说没钱交，但最后还是也发了。同学们要自信，要胸有成竹，相信你就有要价的资本。但是，如果你真着急发，想交钱，但会交很少。对于版面费或评审费的问题，一般情况下，硕士生论文，有些编辑可能要看心情，也说不准，正常录稿比找中介的花得少很多。普刊不交钱的情况还是多，C刊往往都得交评一定审费用，只是说正常录稿交钱少。所以，我建议大家多发普刊，我导师说发文章不准交钱，评审费都不要交，那我就天天呆图书馆，熟悉刊物、改文章，即使投的文章没回复一直也放弃。发C刊也不是交钱就一定可以的，川大6年博士毕业，要发3篇C刊，还有博士生的文章一直没发出去。问：师兄，我想知道C刊，B刊，A刊，核心的区别？答：这个我可以简单给大家说一下。好点的学校期刊的分级，大同小异。川大的期刊分级，五个等级，ABCDE。A刊3种类型。SSCI就是，国际英文刊物。为什么要有一个CSSCI，总体来说，我们国家老师学生掌握英语的能力不是很强，所以弄一个中文核心期刊过渡。不过，现在情况有变，浙大博士就要发1篇SSCI，川大没要求，说不定以后2000后95后学生读博士，以后要发这个。还有一个是权威刊物的22种，各个学科里有一种权威刊物，法学研究，政治学研究等。还有一种A刊，新华文摘摘要文章，新华社办的，1500字相当于A刊，转载效益。A刊就这三类。B刊3种类型。重要刊物。各个学科里，中国法学、比较法研究，每个学科三五种，比较难发。转载也算，中国社会科学文摘摘要，高等学校文科学术文摘摘要，人大复印资料全文转载。报纸有《人民日报（理论版）》，《光明日报（理论版）》，这上面发文章很牛，评职称也需要。C类3种类型。CSSCI一般的刊物。报纸里面的重要报纸，比如法制日报、经济，也算发C类刊物了。三大文科学术文摘论点摘要、学术卡片也算，这三种文摘江安图书馆三楼都可以查到，还有包括人大复印资料。D类：非C刊的北大核心。核心期刊有两个评价体系，北大核心和南大核心。北大核心评价不规范，有很多非学术性的刊物，很多学校认是南大核心。北大核心和C刊有重复。还有一个CSSCI扩展版，平衡地域差异，比如《西南交通大学学报（文科版）》属于扩展板。E类：比较多。平常刊物，论文集，省级报纸也算，现在我们毕业，发两篇普通期刊就可以了。好像你们这一级发一篇就可以了，你们再问一下。问：师兄，你平时的发文平均周期有多长？答：初稿很快，集中写半个月。初稿到修改，质量比较好的文章三个月到半年。可能中间要上课，周期会长一点。大概是这个情况，快的话，投稿一个月时间在普刊就可以发表。我知道我的同学，在暑假时间把作业论文改了改，写问题建议这种论文，三四版面的文章都发表了。有的寒假写了，上半年就可以已经发出来了。针对大多数同学讲，如果用6个月发一篇普刊，时间还是很充裕的。《法制与社会》杂志是一本面向全国公开发行的法制类期刊，她集科学性、思想性、可读性、纪实性为一体，以及时、生动、全面、深刻、充分报道国内外重大新闻的详情和内幕为己任。旨在贴近百姓、关注社会、倡导法制、反映生活，为读者提供丰富的综合信息，法律知识；提供强有力的法律援助，维护合法权益。"Law and society" magazine is the legal journals the nationally published, she is scientific, ideological, readability, documentary as a whole, to timely, comprehensive, profound, vivid, full coverage of major domestic and international news details and insider. In order to close to the people, society, advocating legal system, reflection of life, to provide comprehensive information for readers, rich knowledge of law; legal aid provided strong, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests.《法制与社会》以马克思列宁主义、毛泽东思想、邓小平理论和三个代表重要思想为指导，坚持“双百方针”，鼓励理论创新，支持学术争鸣，促进思想解放，活跃和繁荣理论法学研究。该刊坚持以新世纪的时代精神和主旋律为其精神导向，以新时代的重大实践主题为其现实坐标，努力推进法学理论认识的深化、法学理论内涵的丰富、法学理论体系的升华。"Law and society" by Marx Lenin, Mao Zedong thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thought of Three Represents as the guide, adhere to the "double hundred policy", encourage innovation, support academic contend, promote the emancipation of the mind, active and prosperous jurisprudence research. The journal adhere to the spirit of the times and the theme of new century as their spiritual guide, with great practical theme of the new age for the reality coordinates, efforts to promote the legal theory, legal theory and deepens the understanding of the rich connotation, the theoretic system of the science of sublimation.《法制与社会》杂志是一本集科学性、思想性、理论性为一体的综合期刊。中国学术期刊（光盘版）全文收录期刊，中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊，中国期刊网全文收录期刊。本杂志是一本面向全国公开发行的法制类期刊。到目前为止，法制与社会杂志已经和国内多家媒体建立了紧密的合作关系，并且和中央电视台社会与法频道《第一线》栏目实现了互动刊播。"Law and society" magazine is a comprehensive periodical a scientific, ideological, theoretical integration. Chinese academic journals (CD) full-text included journals, database origin periodical China comprehensive evaluation of academic journals, Chinese Journal Full-text included journals. This magazine is the legal journals a nationwide public offering. So far, Journal of law and social and domestic media to establish a close cooperative relationship, and the realization of the society and law channel and CCTV "front-line" interactive broadcast program.《法制与社会》杂志社理会不仅为社会各界提供了一个相互交流、总结行业经验、树立企、事业单位形象的广阔平台，而且以法律援助、法律服务、理事会法学专家解疑等方式为会员单位提供了法律保护的坚实后盾。该刊面向改革开放和现代化建设实践，努力学习组织、引导和支持具有重大实践意义的课题攻关，为社会主义物质文明、政治文明、精神文明的发展提供科学而富有效益的智力支持和理论指导。"Law and society" magazine about not only provides a mutual exchange, summarize experience, set up enterprises, image of the broad platform for the social from all walks of life, but also provides a solid backing of legal protection to legal aid, legal services, legal experts aimed at dispelling such means as the Council member unit. The journal for reform and opening and modernization construction practice, learning organization, guide and support the research project has important practical significance, intellectual support and theoretical guidance and provide scientific and full of benefits for the development of the socialist material civilization, political civilization,以上

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.2. The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.

法学发表sci有用。根据查询显示Sci是国际知名期刊，收录的都是来自各个国家各个行业学术价值最高的期刊，可想而知sci论文的作用和认可度也是非常高的。

法学英文论文发表

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.2. The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.

法学发表sci有用。根据查询显示Sci是国际知名期刊，收录的都是来自各个国家各个行业学术价值最高的期刊，可想而知sci论文的作用和认可度也是非常高的。

法学论文英文发表

一、刊物选择光文章本身好不够，刊物也要选择好。刊物选择同等重要！（一）刊物选择范围1.不建议投CSSCI来源刊物第一，CSSCI来源刊物审稿周期长。此类刊物审稿周期一般为3到4个月，至少也需2个月。很多刊物不回复，只有少数的刊物没录稿还会给你回复一下。我有一次投一个刊物一个周就回复了，说是编辑初审就没过，这种打击很正常，我们要锲而不舍。也投过《学海》，一个半月就回复，回复说的是我的文章不符合他们刊物的风格。第二，发文周期长。此类刊物从文章定稿到最后刊发一般至少半年。比如，《西北人口》编辑部8月份说录用我的文章，过了半年，到了第二年刊物才出来。可能《法学研究》这种权威刊物，要等一年多。第三，大多CSSCI来源刊物不发硕、博士学生（独立作者）文章。CSSCI来源刊物中的潜在录稿规则导致学生及青年教师文章录稿空间缩小。C刊潜在的规则：知名学者约稿、学者之间相互推荐学生发文、学者之间相互在对方刊物发文、知名学者“姓名”效应等。不像国外的匿名审稿，这些潜在的录稿规则，占C刊稿件比例肯定不在少数，何况还有那么多年轻老师投稿呢。第四，部分CSSCI刊物办刊质量不高。不要以为C刊都好，中国要讲竞争，还要平衡利益。党政部门、名人效应都可能影响C刊的评选。你们注意观察，有些C刊一期七八十篇，还不如普刊。收钱的C刊的，不要发这种刊物，这让自己自我掉价。具体哪些专门收钱、质量不行的C刊我们私下交流，我这里公开讲有故意损人的嫌疑，不讲为好。2.建议多投二本院校非核心的学报这是因为这些二本学报代表学校门面和学术水平，注重办刊质量；审稿周期较短，一般为半个月到1个月以内；发文周期较短，一般2个月内就出刊；愿意录用硕、博士生较高质量的文章。3.建议多投党政院校非核心的学报官方性质，注重办刊质量；审稿周期较短（半个月到1个月以内）；发文周期较短（2个月内就出刊）；愿意录用硕、博士生较高质量的文章；转载率较高。各省地的党政系统学校学报，有145种左右，愿意用我们学生的文章。不要小看这些文章行政院校，被转载的机会很大。2010年转载量中，转载率已经很好了。有些刊物可能你们不知道，例如甘肃行政学院学报，这些的刊物的转载率很高。党政系统的学报转载率高，很注重质量，有综合指数排名，宁波市委党校学报，大家可能没听过，可以成为大家以后投稿的刊物范围。人大复印资料转载量排名前30名的党政系统学报中，转载率在10%以上的共有13种，转载数量在10篇以上的刊物共26种。转载数及转载量排名前30名的党政系统刊物中，非核心期刊占半数以上。二、刊物确定第一，详细了解备选刊物的发文主题。建议进入CNKI把备选刊物过去一年的发文目录找出来，根据目录归类了解刊物发文的主题，对比投稿文章是否与刊物以往发文主题相符合。大家要了解哪些刊物，去图书馆转一转，法学C刊有哪些，可以了解一下。刊物一年的发文目录给看一下，这个已经进行了分类，和主题进行一个对比，看是不是这个范围。如果你的文章主题编辑不熟悉，一般很难被录用。第二，地域差异对刊物主题的影响。沿海的刊物一般不会发民族、西部主题的文章。每个刊物有地域特色，比如西北地区的民族类刊物侧重发藏族的，四川民族刊物侧重彝族。第三，学科差异对刊物主题的影响。法学技术性太强的文章不好投，尽量写和相关学科沾边的文章，这样能够不局限于投法学刊物。第四，研究方法是否适应刊物风格。研究方法、数据统计也很重要，你用太专业的社会学方法、统计学的方法搞研究，投法学核心刊物可能就不合适。因为中国法学的法学研究目前还是文字到文字，属于粗放研究阶段，不像国外引入很多高度量化的研究。三、投稿方式（一）A4纸张打印原则上都用打印稿。打印出来看起来比较舒服，这是一般人的心理。电子投稿和打印邮寄任选一种的也建议用打印稿。电子投稿一般附上文章简要的题目，附上姓名，把文章的基本信息在文件里列出来，单位、摘要、姓名、基金项目，有项目比较好发，如果是同一个专业其他老师也可以挂，只要知会一下，也是做贡献。编辑都是先看题目、摘要，基本信息，大概可以知道有没可能录用你的稿。（二）大号信封邮寄。大号的信封邮寄，刚好装A4纸。邮局都有的，一般可以买几十个备着用。（三）字号和间距。宋体小四号字，行距20磅，这个字号和行距是一般人都能接受的范围。字太大或太小不行，20磅介于单倍到1.5之间。这个字体和行距虽然不是最好，但大部分能接受。编辑一般比较年轻，不存在老花眼问题。（四）排版方式应当能够参考所投刊物。四、论文录用（一）编辑通知录稿的方式1.电话通知（1）一般通过座机打。（2）投稿后的相应时间内要对未接座机号码具备一定敏感性。我投稿《湖北民族学院学报》的时候，5中旬投的，6月初端午节后回校没接到编辑部打来的电话，看到陌生电话以为是打错了。这篇文章三月份到五月份投了20个C刊，只有《学海》回复审稿意见，虽然没录用，还是安慰了我一下，其他全部没有理我。一看作者87年生的，就明白你是学生。后来我投了这个普刊，之后我想万一是编辑部打来的呢，这叫“无心插柳柳成荫”、“功夫不负有心人”。我一查是湖北的区号，就回过去，编辑说要录用我的稿件，之后就是修改了。也有人和我相反的处理方式。我院有同学投了关于民族地区宗教信仰调查的文章，投稿后一段时候后曾发现手机有未接座机号码，之后没有及时主动回复。过了段时间，他给刊物联系，结果编辑告知他本来打算录用他的文章，当时曾电话联系过，但是他没有接到电话。编辑表示，如果他本人同意，还可以发表他的文章。但是，这时已经过了中期考核的时间。一个编辑会审很多文章，具体审稿的编辑人手也不会很多，很可能一忙就会忘哪个电话没有打通。这个例子是给大家打打预防针，这是一个教训。2.邮件通知邮件的话会发一个正式的文件，附修改规范，问是否同意在本刊发文。(1)决定录用，问本人是否同意。可以一稿多投，但不可以一稿多用。很多刊物说不能一稿多投，但只是单方约定，录稿了都得给你联系，要得到作者同意。(2)大致刊用的时间、期数。（3）不同意发文可直接回复邮件。刊物定稿前，都可以撤稿。撤稿发邮件同时，最好电话联系。3、文章返修（1）参照本刊物的排版及注释规范。（2）权威刊物出具匿名审稿人意见。权威刊物或者好刊物修改的次数可能多次。文科发文章，周期比较快。我知道一个华西的博士，国外的Medline数据库刊物，从录稿到最后发文整整用了3年时间，中间修改了8次。国内中文刊物编辑改了一到两次就可以了。最后是发来文章校样让作者最后核对。Q&A问：二本学校的学报，什么时候要求投稿人支付版面费？求支付版面费的问题你怎么看呢？答：如果真的涉及到中期考核的问题，你的文章被录稿。可以给编辑谈判的，要不就撤稿。他一般会用的，即使你说不交钱。你想一下正规的二本学报或者其他党政系统学校学报为什么要你一个学生的文章呢？你有要价的资本，要有自信，肯定是你写得比一般人要好，至少有些新意。我们有博士，一家普刊说要他的文章，但说版面费的事情，他就说没钱交，但最后还是也发了。同学们要自信，要胸有成竹，相信你就有要价的资本。但是，如果你真着急发，想交钱，但会交很少。对于版面费或评审费的问题，一般情况下，硕士生论文，有些编辑可能要看心情，也说不准，正常录稿比找中介的花得少很多。普刊不交钱的情况还是多，C刊往往都得交评一定审费用，只是说正常录稿交钱少。所以，我建议大家多发普刊，我导师说发文章不准交钱，评审费都不要交，那我就天天呆图书馆，熟悉刊物、改文章，即使投的文章没回复一直也放弃。发C刊也不是交钱就一定可以的，川大6年博士毕业，要发3篇C刊，还有博士生的文章一直没发出去。问：师兄，我想知道C刊，B刊，A刊，核心的区别？答：这个我可以简单给大家说一下。好点的学校期刊的分级，大同小异。川大的期刊分级，五个等级，ABCDE。A刊3种类型。SSCI就是，国际英文刊物。为什么要有一个CSSCI，总体来说，我们国家老师学生掌握英语的能力不是很强，所以弄一个中文核心期刊过渡。不过，现在情况有变，浙大博士就要发1篇SSCI，川大没要求，说不定以后2000后95后学生读博士，以后要发这个。还有一个是权威刊物的22种，各个学科里有一种权威刊物，法学研究，政治学研究等。还有一种A刊，新华文摘摘要文章，新华社办的，1500字相当于A刊，转载效益。A刊就这三类。B刊3种类型。重要刊物。各个学科里，中国法学、比较法研究，每个学科三五种，比较难发。转载也算，中国社会科学文摘摘要，高等学校文科学术文摘摘要，人大复印资料全文转载。报纸有《人民日报（理论版）》，《光明日报（理论版）》，这上面发文章很牛，评职称也需要。C类3种类型。CSSCI一般的刊物。报纸里面的重要报纸，比如法制日报、经济，也算发C类刊物了。三大文科学术文摘论点摘要、学术卡片也算，这三种文摘江安图书馆三楼都可以查到，还有包括人大复印资料。D类：非C刊的北大核心。核心期刊有两个评价体系，北大核心和南大核心。北大核心评价不规范，有很多非学术性的刊物，很多学校认是南大核心。北大核心和C刊有重复。还有一个CSSCI扩展版，平衡地域差异，比如《西南交通大学学报（文科版）》属于扩展板。E类：比较多。平常刊物，论文集，省级报纸也算，现在我们毕业，发两篇普通期刊就可以了。好像你们这一级发一篇就可以了，你们再问一下。问：师兄，你平时的发文平均周期有多长？答：初稿很快，集中写半个月。初稿到修改，质量比较好的文章三个月到半年。可能中间要上课，周期会长一点。大概是这个情况，快的话，投稿一个月时间在普刊就可以发表。我知道我的同学，在暑假时间把作业论文改了改，写问题建议这种论文，三四版面的文章都发表了。有的寒假写了，上半年就可以已经发出来了。针对大多数同学讲，如果用6个月发一篇普刊，时间还是很充裕的。《法制与社会》杂志是一本面向全国公开发行的法制类期刊，她集科学性、思想性、可读性、纪实性为一体，以及时、生动、全面、深刻、充分报道国内外重大新闻的详情和内幕为己任。旨在贴近百姓、关注社会、倡导法制、反映生活，为读者提供丰富的综合信息，法律知识；提供强有力的法律援助，维护合法权益。"Law and society" magazine is the legal journals the nationally published, she is scientific, ideological, readability, documentary as a whole, to timely, comprehensive, profound, vivid, full coverage of major domestic and international news details and insider. In order to close to the people, society, advocating legal system, reflection of life, to provide comprehensive information for readers, rich knowledge of law; legal aid provided strong, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests.《法制与社会》以马克思列宁主义、毛泽东思想、邓小平理论和三个代表重要思想为指导，坚持“双百方针”，鼓励理论创新，支持学术争鸣，促进思想解放，活跃和繁荣理论法学研究。该刊坚持以新世纪的时代精神和主旋律为其精神导向，以新时代的重大实践主题为其现实坐标，努力推进法学理论认识的深化、法学理论内涵的丰富、法学理论体系的升华。"Law and society" by Marx Lenin, Mao Zedong thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thought of Three Represents as the guide, adhere to the "double hundred policy", encourage innovation, support academic contend, promote the emancipation of the mind, active and prosperous jurisprudence research. The journal adhere to the spirit of the times and the theme of new century as their spiritual guide, with great practical theme of the new age for the reality coordinates, efforts to promote the legal theory, legal theory and deepens the understanding of the rich connotation, the theoretic system of the science of sublimation.《法制与社会》杂志是一本集科学性、思想性、理论性为一体的综合期刊。中国学术期刊（光盘版）全文收录期刊，中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊，中国期刊网全文收录期刊。本杂志是一本面向全国公开发行的法制类期刊。到目前为止，法制与社会杂志已经和国内多家媒体建立了紧密的合作关系，并且和中央电视台社会与法频道《第一线》栏目实现了互动刊播。"Law and society" magazine is a comprehensive periodical a scientific, ideological, theoretical integration. Chinese academic journals (CD) full-text included journals, database origin periodical China comprehensive evaluation of academic journals, Chinese Journal Full-text included journals. This magazine is the legal journals a nationwide public offering. So far, Journal of law and social and domestic media to establish a close cooperative relationship, and the realization of the society and law channel and CCTV "front-line" interactive broadcast program.《法制与社会》杂志社理会不仅为社会各界提供了一个相互交流、总结行业经验、树立企、事业单位形象的广阔平台，而且以法律援助、法律服务、理事会法学专家解疑等方式为会员单位提供了法律保护的坚实后盾。该刊面向改革开放和现代化建设实践，努力学习组织、引导和支持具有重大实践意义的课题攻关，为社会主义物质文明、政治文明、精神文明的发展提供科学而富有效益的智力支持和理论指导。"Law and society" magazine about not only provides a mutual exchange, summarize experience, set up enterprises, image of the broad platform for the social from all walks of life, but also provides a solid backing of legal protection to legal aid, legal services, legal experts aimed at dispelling such means as the Council member unit. The journal for reform and opening and modernization construction practice, learning organization, guide and support the research project has important practical significance, intellectual support and theoretical guidance and provide scientific and full of benefits for the development of the socialist material civilization, political civilization,以上

法硕通常发表英文论文。但国内的法学期刊或者社科综合期刊经济类刊物发表论文用中文即可。

英文法学论文发表

法硕通常发表英文论文。但国内的法学期刊或者社科综合期刊经济类刊物发表论文用中文即可。

《海外英语》、《英语广场》等期刊可以发表英语学术论文。

从广义上来讲，期刊的分类，可以分为非正式期刊和正式期刊两种。非正式期刊是指通过行政部门审核领取“内部报刊准印证”作为行业内部交流的期刊，但也是合法期刊的一种，一般正式期刊都经历过非正式期刊过程。

正式期刊是由国家新闻出版署与国家科委在商定的数额内审批，并编入“国内统一刊号”，办刊申请比较严格，要有一定的办刊实力，正式期刊有独立的办刊方针。

了解核心期刊具有重要的意义。就编者而言，可以从核心期刊吸取经验。就读者而言，树立核心期刊意识，可以明确价值取向，提高阅读档次。

就图书馆而言，在经费有限的情况下，订阅时当然是以核心期刊为首选目标。就科研管理部门而言，可以统计分析单位或个人在核心期刊上发表论文的情况，以此作为衡量其学术水平的一项重要指标。

如何在国外电子平台上出版英文论文？1. 投稿：一般情况下，你想在电子出版平台上出版文章或者论文，首先你得在该出版平台上注册，写清楚邮箱和电话等联系方式很重要，这便于你投稿，以及和出版社工作人员沟通。 同时，在投稿之前，你得写好你的稿件，稿件质量很重要，不然很难通过审核。 其次，选择投递的期刊名称，这个就属于对你自己的文章的一个定位了，投递方向正确了，审核才能顺利进行。 2. 审稿和修改：在你的稿件成功投递之后，会有专业的审稿人对你的稿件进行审核，审核内容包括稿件的标题、单位信息，摘要，关键词，内容、字数、参考文献，及文章质量等。等到确认你的文章在这些方面，没有什么大问题，可以经过简单的修改就可以出版。如果有问题，你需要根据审稿人的要求进行修改，经过修改的文章，最终确定没有问题，就可以着手出版了。 3. 出版：一般在稿件修改完成以后，出版平台会进行一个最终的排版，然后跟你做最后确认一次来定稿，没有什么问题就可以出版了，当然，出版之前，你得支付出版费用。一般情况下，费用会根据出版平台、稿件字数和内容等的不同，而不 同。比如一些国际性的大出版社，一般的费用就在1600美金左右，多的高达3000美金。其他一些收费没有那么贵的，也就400美金左右。 4. 增值服务：一般在电子出版平台出版书刊后，会给客户提供一定的增值服务。比如Science Publishing Group 这个平台，客户在这个平台出版书刊以后，可以免费阅读和下载这个平台的英文文献和资料，同时也可以转载或者分享自己的作品到自己的社交平台等。不管是什么样的增值服务，对投稿人来说，都是有益的。总之，在这个互联网时代，选择电子出版，比选择传统的出版，多了一些便利、快捷，同时也最大限度的分享知识。若可能，你的文章或者其他作品，会分享给世界各地有需求的人，并且长久的保存下来。